Finding the capcitance of this capacitator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the capacitance of a capacitor filled with dielectric materials that change linearly from ε1 to ε2. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the capacitance based on the varying dielectric constant and the integration of differential capacitances.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the integral for calculating the total capacitance, questioning the presence of factors and the interpretation of variables. There is a focus on the relationship between the dielectric constant and the distance between the plates.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding the setup of the integral and the units involved in the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical expressions and their implications, with no clear consensus reached on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with variable naming and the interpretation of units in the context of the problem. There is also mention of the need to clarify the definitions of the variables used in the integration process.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
given the capacitator C1 filled with dialectric subtances, which change linearly from ε1 to ε2, what is the capacitance of C1?

since i know that ε changes linerly, according to the distance between the plates, and i know that at x=0 ε=ε1 and x=d ε=ε2

εr=ax+b
εr1=a*0+b
b=ε1
εr2=a*d+ε1
a=(ε21)/d

εr=(ε21)x/d+ε1
εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d

know this capacitator C1 is like millions of tiny little capacitators, dC, each with dialectric substance changing like εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d, all connected in a column,

1/Cp=[tex]\int[/tex]d/(Aε0εr)d(εr) from (ε1 to ε2)

=d/(Aε0)[tex]\int[/tex]d(d/((ε21)x+ε1d))

=d2/(Aε0)[tex]\int[/tex]dx/((ε21)x+ε1d) (from 0 to d)

=d2/(Aε0)*1/(ε21)* ln((ε21)x+ε1d)|from 0 to d

=[d2ln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0


but the correct answer is meant to be 1/Cp=[dln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0

can anyone see whre i went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dell said:
given the capacitator C1 filled with dialectric subtances, which change linearly from ε1 to ε2, what is the capacitance of C1?

since i know that ε changes linerly, according to the distance between the plates, and i know that at x=0 ε=ε1 and x=d ε=ε2

εr=ax+b
εr1=a*0+b
b=ε1
εr2=a*d+ε1
a=(ε21)/d

εr=(ε21)x/d+ε1
εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d

know this capacitator C1 is like millions of tiny little capacitators, dC, each with dialectric substance changing like εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d, all connected in a column,

1/Cp=∫d/(Aε0εr)d(εr) from (ε1 to ε2)

=d/(Aε0)∫d(d/((ε21)x+ε1d))

While I don't exactly follow what you are doing, it appears that your extra factor of d first appears here.

Just as a general rule, I wouldn't name a variable d if integration will be involved in solving the problem. Too easy to lose track of which is the variable d, and which is used to denote the variable of integration.

=d2/(Aε0)∫dx/((ε21)x+ε1d) (from 0 to d)

=d2/(Aε0)*1/(ε21)* ln((ε21)x+ε1d)|from 0 to d

=[d2ln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0


but the correct answer is meant to be 1/Cp=[dln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0

can anyone see whre i went wrong?
 
thats exactly right, the problem comes from the fact that i already have one 'd' and my εr is also dependent on 'd' εr=((ε2-ε1)x+ε1d)/d and that's where the second factor comes from, but i cannot see why this should be incorrect mathematically.
 
I would have set up the integral differently to begin with. What is 1/C for a slab of thickness dx? (d→differential, not capacitor thickness here) Then add them by doing the appropriate integral, as you are aware. It's not clear to me how you got the first integral you wrote.

p.s. there is a problem with the "correct" answer you quoted,

1/Cp=[d ln(ε21)] / [ε021) A ε0],​

because the units are inconsistent.
 
and the units of my answer??
 
It would be beneficial for you to work that out. They should come out to be 1/F.
 
I'll offer this hint:

The quantity d / (A ε0) has the correct units of 1/Farads. So any remaining terms should, overall, be unitless.
 
d / (A ε0) = 1/F

d2ln(ε2/ε1)]/(ε2-ε1)Aε0=d/(A ε0)* (d*ln(ε2/ε1)/(ε2/ε1))

what would the units of (d*ln(ε2/ε1)/(ε2/ε1)) be
 
The ε's are all unitless, leaving ... ?
 
  • #10
so i get m/F,

but you said that there was a problem with the "correct " answers units, as far as i see they come to 1/F

1/Cp=[dln(ε2/ε1)]/(ε2-ε1)Aε0

i just saw that i wrote
1/Cp=[dln(ε2/ε1)]/ε0(ε2-ε1)Aε0
and there is an extra ε0, but you said that they are unitless
 
  • #11
e0 does have units, e1 and e2 do not.

So, the "correct" answer has the correct units afterall.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
so how would you have solved it?
the capacitance you spoke of would be

1/C=dx/(ε0εrA)
=dx/(ε0((ε2-ε1)x+ε1D)/D)A)

i used D for the distance

= D/(ε0A)∫dx/((ε21)x+ε1D)
=D/(ε0A(ε21)) * [ln(ε21)]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if i would not have taken 1/C but instead C, why would i not reach the correct answer,
 
  • #13
The slabs of thickness dx act as many capacitors in series.

For capacitors in series, we add the reciprocals of capacitance to get total capacitance.
 
  • #14
Dell said:
so how would you have solved it?
Oh, I forgot to say in my last post ... I would do exactly what you did here:
the capacitance you spoke of would be

1/C=dx/(ε0εrA)
=dx/(ε0((ε2-ε1)x+ε1D)/D)A)

i used D for the distance

= D/(ε0A)∫dx/((ε21)x+ε1D)
=D/(ε0A(ε21)) * [ln(ε21)]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K