Finding the Charge on a Capacitor in a Circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the charge on capacitors in a circuit using the equations q=CV, C=C1+C2 (for parallel), and 1/C=1/C1+1/C2 (for series). The user initially miscalculated the total charge due to confusion between voltage across branches and the battery voltage. It was clarified that both branches of capacitors are in parallel with the battery, resulting in a voltage of 12V across each branch. The concept of a capacitive voltage divider was introduced, emphasizing that the voltage across series capacitors divides based on their capacitance values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor configurations: series and parallel
  • Familiarity with the equations for capacitance and charge (q=CV)
  • Basic knowledge of voltage division in electrical circuits
  • Ability to calculate equivalent capacitance for series and parallel combinations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of capacitive voltage dividers in detail
  • Learn how to derive the voltage split formula for capacitors in series
  • Explore practical applications of capacitors in electronic circuits
  • Review problems involving complex capacitor networks to enhance problem-solving skills
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, educators teaching circuit theory, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of capacitor behavior in circuits.

pietastesgood
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



nodi10.jpg


Homework Equations



q=CV
C=C1+C2...(parallel)
1/C=1/C1+1/C2...(series)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not completely understanding these problems on capacitors in a circuit, as the textbook was pretty brief when explaining these particular concepts. I've only tried part a and b, but I've gotten neither right. This was my train of thought:

C(top branch)=(1/(1x10^-6)+1/(3x10^-6))^-1 = 7.5x10^-7 Farads
C(bottom branch)=(1/(2x10^-6)+1/(4x10^-6))^-1 = 1.33 x 10^-6 Farads
C(net)=2.08x10^-6 Farads
using q=CV, q=2.496x10^-5 Coulombs.

In the top branch of the circuit, the charges on C1 and C3 are equal. The voltage is divided equally between the two branches, so 6 V goes to the top branch and 6 V to the bottom branch. Using q=CV, q1+q3=C(top)*V(top)=4.5x10^-6 coulombs. Since in a series, the charges are the same, q(top)=q1=q3, so q1=q3=4.5x10^-6 coulombs. However, the answer is 9.0x10^-6 coulombs. Where did I go wrong? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pietastesgood said:
In the top branch of the circuit, the charges on C1 and C3 are equal. The voltage is divided equally between the two branches, so 6 V goes to the top branch and 6 V to the bottom branch.
Noooo. Both branches have 12V across them, since they are both in parallel with the battery. Parallel branches have the same potential drop.
 
Wait, I'm rather confused. If both branches have 12 V potential difference, doesn't that mean that the total voltage is 24 V? Also, how are the capacitors in parallel with the battery? Aren't the branches themselves in series with the battery?
 
You have a battery and two parallel branches. C1 and C3 comprise one branch, C2 and C4 comprise the other. The battery fixes the potential across each branch that it parallels.
 
I understand that there are two parallel branches, and I understand that the voltage in each branch is equal, but I still don't quite understand why that voltage is 12 and not 6. Is the voltage of the battery simply the voltage through every branch, and if so, why?
 
pietastesgood said:
I understand that there are two parallel branches, and I understand that the voltage in each branch is equal, but I still don't quite understand why that voltage is 12 and not 6. Is the voltage of the battery simply the voltage through every branch, and if so, why?

Voltage goes "across", current goes "through". The 12V of the battery is across both branches, so both branches "see" the 12 V of the battery.
 
Okay, I think I've been confusing voltage with current, since current does divide when it goes through branches. However, because of this explanation, a previous problem doesn't make sense now:

2djzcrq.jpg


For point B, the answer stated that the voltage across C1 and C2 was q/C, or 72x10^-6/12x10^-6, or 6 V, not the 12 V like the battery. Why is this case different than that of the previous problem?
 
pietastesgood said:
Okay, I think I've been confusing voltage with current, since current does divide when it goes through branches. However, because of this explanation, a previous problem doesn't make sense now:

2djzcrq.jpg


For point B, the answer stated that the voltage across C1 and C2 was q/C, or 72x10^-6/12x10^-6, or 6 V, not the 12 V like the battery. Why is this case different than that of the previous problem?

Because in this case C3 forms a series connection with the net capacitance of C1 || C2. In effect, branch that parallels the battery is comprised of C3 in series with C1 || C2.
 
So am I right in thinking that if the capacitors are in series with the battery, then the voltages across the capacitors aren't necessarily the same as across the battery?

I also tried thinking it out this way (unsuccessfully). Since the charge is the same through C3 and C1+C2, and since C3 has a charge of C3*12, and since C1+C2=C3, then the net charge through C1+C2 is C3*12 also. Then according to that logic, the voltage across C1, for example, is C3*12/C1, or 36 V, which isn't right.
 
  • #10
pietastesgood said:
So am I right in thinking that if the capacitors are in series with the battery, then the voltages across the capacitors aren't necessarily the same as across the battery?
Correct. The voltages across series capacitors will sum to the voltage across the series string. Or in other words, series capacitors create a form of voltage divider. Call the parallel combination of C1 and C2 Cp. That is, Cp = C1 || C2. Then the potential across Cp plus the potential across C3 must equal the potential of the battery, 12V.
I also tried thinking it out this way (unsuccessfully). Since the charge is the same through C3 and C1+C2, and since C3 has a charge of C3*12, and since C1+C2=C3, then the net charge through C1+C2 is C3*12 also. Then according to that logic, the voltage across C1, for example, is C3*12/C1, or 36 V, which isn't right.
Yes, your thinking is incorrect because you have assumed that there is 12V across both C3 and Cp. This is not the case, as the 12V will be divided between the two capacitances. How the potential divides depends upon the capacitances, C3 and Cp. But they must sum to 12V.
 
  • #11
Wait, so for number 23, the potential across C3 is also 6 V? With that diagram, how does one even tell how the voltages are broken up. Is the reason why C3 has a potential difference of 6 V and Cp has a potential difference of 6 V because C3=Cp?
 
  • #12
pietastesgood said:
Wait, so for number 23, the potential across C3 is also 6 V? With that diagram, how does one even tell how the voltages are broken up. Is the reason why C3 has a potential difference of 6 V and Cp has a potential difference of 6 V because C3=Cp?

Yup. Equal capacitances with equal charges yield equal potential differences (voltages).

The capacitive voltage divider is a circuit you should learn to recognize. It comes up fairly often, and it helps if you can write down the voltage split by inspection. There's a simple formula that tells you how the voltage splits, and it's based upon the individual capacitor values.

You can derive it yourself by considering two capacitors in series with a given total potential across them. You know what the total equivalent capacitance is, so you know the charge q that will be on the equivalent capacitor, and therefore on both of the capacitors (series connection so same charge). knowing the charge and capacitance values, you can find the individual potentials.
 
  • #13
Alrighty, I think I got it. Thanks for all the help and being so patient!
 
  • #14
pietastesgood said:
Alrighty, I think I got it. Thanks for all the help and being so patient!

Glad to be of help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
887
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K