Finding the Closest Match to a Theoretical Curve

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stats_student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Match Theoretical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for matching a theoretical curve to an experimental dataset, specifically focusing on optimizing parameters to minimize the differences between observed and theoretical values. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and potential statistical techniques for curve fitting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes an initial approach of minimizing the sum of squared differences between observed and theoretical values by adjusting a single parameter in the equation used to generate the theoretical curve.
  • Another participant suggests the possibility of applying weights to each data point to improve the fit of the upper part of the curve, inquiring if a formal procedure exists for this method.
  • A different participant proposes the idea of performing a least squares regression focused solely on the upper part of the curve, questioning whether this approach is valid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the best method for matching the curves, and multiple competing views regarding potential approaches remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the specific equation used for the theoretical curve, the assumptions behind the proposed methods, and the potential impact of ignoring parts of the curve on the overall fitting process.

stats_student
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, i have been tasked with matching the upper a theoretical curve (seen in the picture-blue) to the upper experimental part. So far in an attempt to do this i have tried changing a single parameter in the equation i used to generate the theoretical curve, so that the sum of the differences between each observed and theoretical value is minimized.

as an example - my calculations are as follows:

(O1-T1)^2 = x
(O2-T2)^2 = y

where O and T stand for observed and theoretical. I then have summed x & y and then in excel change my parameter in the equation until x+y is minimized.

the results i get are shown in the picture.

I'm just wondering if there is a better method at getting the upper part of my curve to match as closely as possible.
Also keep in mind I'm allowed to change any of the parameters in the equation i have used.

any advice would be greatly appreciated thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Pic.jpg
    Pic.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 421
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh also the equation i have used is also shown in the picture.
 
i was thinking maybe a method where i attach weights to each point so that the upper part of the curve is matched more closely? Does a formal procedure for that exist?
 
Or perhaps i could ignore the bottom part of my curve and do a least squares regression on the upper part only?
not really sure if I'm thinking about this the right way.
any input would be appreciated.

Cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K