Finding the Composition of Relations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



R = { (1,2), (3,5), (2,2), (2,5) }
S = { (2,1), (5,3), (5,1), (5,5) }

Explicitly find the relation R^-1 o S^-1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This was on my test.

First I just wrote down the inverses:

R^-1 = { (2,1), (5,3), (2,2), (5,2) }
S^-1 = { (1,2), (3,5), (1,5), (5,5) }

I didn't know what to do because the definition we learned defines 3 other sets, and all of the exercises in my test book has those 3 other sets defined.

For example, there are usually sets A, B, and C along with the sets R and S. So I have no idea how I can apply the definition to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



R = { (1,2), (3,5), (2,2), (2,5) }
S = { (2,1), (5,3), (5,1), (5,5) }

Explicitly find the relation R^-1 o S^-1

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This was on my test.

First I just wrote down the inverses:

R^-1 = { (2,1), (5,3), (2,2), (5,2) }
S^-1 = { (1,2), (3,5), (1,5), (5,5) }
So [itex]S^{-1}[/itex] "maps" 1 to 2 and [itex]R^{-1}[/itex] maps 2 to 1. Therefore [itex]R^{-1}oS^{-1}[/itex] maps 1 to 1 and contains the pair (1, 1).

[itex]R^{-1}[/itex] also maps 2 to 2 so [itex]R^{-1}oS^{-1}[/itex] also maps 1 to 2 and contains the pair (1, 2).

I didn't know what to do because the definition we learned defines 3 other sets, and all of the exercises in my test book has those 3 other sets defined.
What 3 sets?

For example, there are usually sets A, B, and C along with the sets R and S. So I have no idea how I can apply the definition to do this.
fog contains the pair (a, b) if and only if there exist some c such that g contains (a, c) and f contains (c, b).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So (3,3) is in the composition because we have (5,3) and (3,5)?
 
I think the other three sets in my definition are A, B, and C and are dupposed to be the domain of R, the Range of R/domain of S, and the range of S.

Sound reasonable?
 
1MileCrash said:
I think the other three sets in my definition are A, B, and C and are supposed to be the domain of R, the Range of R/domain of S, and the range of S.

Sound reasonable?
As Halls said earlier, "What 3 sets?"

The domain of R is {1,2,3}.

The domain of S is {2,5}.

etc.