Finding the deflection using the unit load method.

In summary, the conversation discusses the process of using the unit load method to determine the value of vertical deflection at a given point on a loaded beam. The conversation also includes equations and calculations for solving the problem, and various attempts and revisions in finding the correct solution.
  • #1
willnich35
7
0

Homework Statement



A uniform beam, supported by a uniform strut, is loaded as shown in Figure (Attached). Using the unit load method, determine the value of the vertical deflection at C.
BEAM: E = 205 kN/mm2, I = 90 x 106 mm4.
STRUT: E = 205 kN/mm2, A = 1500 mm2.

Homework Equations



The virtual work equation, which is.

1.[tex]\Delta[/tex]=[tex]\sum[/tex]p[tex]\frac{PL}{AE}[/tex]+[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{mM}{EI}[/tex]dx

The Attempt at a Solution



REAL Reactions at A and B in the x and y directions:

Fx = Ax + Bx = 0
Fy = Ay + 15 + (4*2) - By = 0
Mb = (15*2) - 8 - 2Ay = 0

Ay = 11 kN
By = 34 kN
Ax = Bx = 17 * SqRt(2)

Axial Force (P) in member AB = 17 * SqRt(2)
DB = 34 * SqRt(2)

VIRTUAL Reactions

Apply a force of 1 kN downwards at C

Axial Force (p) in member AB = -2
DB = 2 * SqRt(2)

I then attempted to solve the virtual work equation, however the value of A for member AC is not given.

So i guess my questions are, have I started this correctly, and how do I solve the problem?
 

Attachments

  • ass.jpg
    ass.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 930
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think you must be worrying about the axial shortening of DB, whose A is not given. Even if you know it, and assuming no compression buckling, the shortening of the strut would have a relatively small contribution to make to the deflection at C. You could insert your own practical value of A to assure yourself how small it really is. One might also recognise that AB also has some axial compression, but you don't know that area either. To be pedantic, the hinge at A is off the centreline, so there actually is a small additional moment due to the eccentric axial load there, but I recommend you note this but ignore it. Incidentally I would say Ax= - 11 not + 11. I don't agree your values of Bx and Ax. Have you checked your figure for equilibrium with the reaction components you have calculated, for example by taking moments about C? Have you drawn a force diagram to scale for all the external forces on this structure? That is a good way to reveal errors. On re-reading the question, I see a value of A is given.
 
  • #3
Thank you very much for your quick answer. Massive help! Should be able to work it out now.
 
  • #4
I have an answer, which makes sense. I would greatly appreciate it if you would check it over.

Ay = -11 kN
By = 34 kN

Ax = Bx = 34 * SqRt(2)

Axial Force (P) in member DB = 34 * SqRt(3)

VIRTUAL Reactions

Axial Force (p) in member DB = 2 * SqRt(3)

[tex]\frac{pPL}{AE}[/tex] = 1.876mm (Deflection due to axial load on DB)

[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{(-x1)(-11x1)}{EI}[/tex]dx1 + [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{(-x2)(-15x2)}{EI}[/tex]dx2

Integrating between 0 and 2 for both x1 and x2

= 3.758mm (Deflection due to bending moments in beam)

TOTAL DEFLECTION = 5.634mm Downwards
 
  • #5
I don't agree your reactions at Ax and Bx. Have you really checked equilibrium using your values, as I suggested.
And even if I did, how do you get axial force in BD as you do? You are not showing all your working, and therefore your work is uncheckable. In your integrals, you seem to have forgotten the effect of the udl. Is the expression pPL/AE really giving you the deflection at C? I think not. So what is it saying to you?
Finally, your answer has ridiculous "accuracy". It is disproportionate to the assumptions being made. In that sense, it is wrong. Please try again. It's worth it.
 
  • #6
Ok, thanks again. Not my strongest subject this, il have another go.
 
  • #7
Ok, here's my next attempt
I've done it in word, as the workings are easier, and attached a picture.

I really hope the reactions Ax and Bx, and the force in member AD are right now, the triangles should explain how i got the numbers.

As for the virtual work equation,

dx1 works from A to B
dx2 works from C to B

M1 is the real bending moment equation of section AB
m1 is the virtual bending moment equation of section AB
M2 is the real bending moment equation of section CB
m2 is the virtual bending moment equation of section CB

M1 hopefully now incorporates the moment due to the UDL.
 

Attachments

  • solu.jpg
    solu.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 587
  • #8
Just noticed the second line should be Fy= not Fx=

and Ax = -Bx
 
  • #9
I don't agree your result, doing it a different way. For example, PL/AE is the elastic shortening of DB, and I get 0.44 mm. This has a vertical component of 0.44 / sqrt 2 = 0.31 mm. So the deflection at C due to elastic shortening of DB should be 0.62 mm, not 1.25 mm (your figure). I agree your result for bending = 4.19 mm.
 
  • #10
Thank you, that makes sense.
However it does seem to conflict slightly with my notes, so il go have a chat with my lecturer tomorrow.
Thanks for your time and help though, huge help!
 

1. What is the unit load method for finding deflection?

The unit load method is a structural analysis technique used to determine the deflection of a beam or structure under a concentrated load. It involves calculating the deflection at a specific point by applying a unit load at that point and then multiplying it by the desired load magnitude.

2. How is the unit load method different from other methods for finding deflection?

The unit load method is different from other methods, such as the moment area method or the conjugate beam method, because it only considers the deflection caused by a single concentrated load. It is typically used for simple beams or structures with point loads.

3. What are the steps involved in using the unit load method for finding deflection?

The steps for using the unit load method are as follows: 1) Identify the point of interest where the deflection will be calculated. 2) Apply a unit load (1 pound or 1 kilonewton) at that point. 3) Calculate the deflection caused by the unit load using the appropriate equations. 4) Multiply the deflection by the desired load magnitude to get the final deflection at the point of interest.

4. What are the assumptions made when using the unit load method for finding deflection?

The unit load method assumes that the beam or structure is linearly elastic, meaning that it obeys Hooke's Law and will return to its original shape once the load is removed. It also assumes that the deflections are small and that the structure is homogeneous and isotropic, meaning its properties are the same in all directions.

5. Can the unit load method be used for all types of beams and structures?

No, the unit load method is typically used for simple beams or structures with point loads. It may not be suitable for more complex structures or those with distributed loads. In these cases, other methods such as the moment area method or finite element analysis may be more appropriate for finding deflection.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top