Finding the electric field at point p in this formation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a specific point (point P) due to four point charges in a given configuration. The participants are exploring concepts related to electric fields and Coulomb's Law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the contributions of different charges to the electric field at point P, questioning how to account for both positive and negative charges. There is uncertainty about the distances involved and how to combine the electric field contributions symbolically.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem symbolically rather than numerically. There is ongoing exploration of algebraic manipulation of the electric field expressions, with participants questioning their understanding of simplification and the implications of negative charges.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of specific numerical values for the charges and distances, which is causing confusion among participants. The discussion includes a focus on the algebraic representation of the electric field without resolving to a final numerical answer.

shqiptargirl
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the magnitude of the electric field at point p due to the four point charges shown? The distance d is between charge centers.
coulombsexample.png


Homework Equations


Electric Field = kq/d^2
Coulomb's Law = k(q1q2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to go about solving this for a multiple of reasons. First of all, the formation is really throwing me off. I think both the positive and negative 5 charges cancel out, but I'm not too sure how to calculate the forces on p due to the +3.0 and -12
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shqiptargirl said:
I don't know how to go about solving this for a multiple of reasons. First of all, the formation is really throwing me off. I think both the positive and negative 5 charges cancel out, but I'm not too sure how to calculate the forces on p due to the +3.0 and -12
Hi shqiptargirl, Welcome to Physics Forums.

I don't see any negative 5q charges, just two positive 5q charges. But you're right about their fields cancelling at P.

Note that you're looking for the field contributions of the other charges at point P, not forces (there's no charge at P on which a force could be developed). Use your electric field equation from your Relevant equations. What are the distances of the +3q and -12q charges from point P?
 
That's what I have trouble understanding. I know the electric field at point E due to the +3 charge would be (9 * 10^9)(3)/d^2. And the electric field at point p due to the -12 charge would be (9 *10^9)(12)/(2d)^2. But I don't know where to go from there. How do I add them together if the distance remains unknown?

I am also confused because one charge is negative. Do I include the negative symbol when calculating the electric field?
 
shqiptargirl said:
That's what I have trouble understanding. I know the electric field at point E due to the +3 charge would be (9 * 10^9)(3)/d^2. And the electric field at point p due to the -12 charge would be (9 *10^9)(12)/(2d)^2. But I don't know where to go from there. How do I add them together if the distance remains unknown?
Note that you're not given a value for q either. Being of a suspicious nature, I'd look for a trick if you're asked for a numerical result :rolleyes:. Add the two field magnitudes up symbolically and see what it looks like.
 
That's what I don't understand unfortunately. How do I add up the two fields? I know I have to make the denominators equal first. So I would multiply both the denominator and numerator of (9*10^9)(3)/d^2 by 2. From that point on I am confused. Am I suppose to distribute the 2 to both (9*10^9) and to (3) ?
 
You should forget the numerical value for the Coulomb constant and just write "k" for now, since you're doing a symbolic manipulation.

You're adding:

##E = k \frac{3q}{d^2} + k \frac{-12q}{(2d)^2} ##

See if you can simplify the second term a bit first.
 
Okay, with this I got k *6q/2d^2+ k*-12q/2d^2. Can I know add them together to get k* -6q/2d^2 and then simplify to get -3q/d^2?

Also, how do you format your fractions so nicely?
 
shqiptargirl said:
Okay, with this I got k *6q/2d^2+ k*-12q/2d^2. Can I know add them together to get k* -6q/2d^2 and then simplify to get -3q/d^2?
Something's gone awry in your algebra. Take note that the (2d) in the denominator of the second term is ALL squared. How do you expand ##(2 d)^2 ##? Cancel what you can there in that term.
Also, how do you format your fractions so nicely?
I'm using Latex syntax. If you hit "Reply" on one of my posts with it in it you'll see the tags and such.
 
Okay I think I figured it out. If I expanded ##E = k \frac{-12q}{2d^2} ## I'd get ##E = k \frac{-12q}{2d*2d} ## which would simplify to -3?

The thing I don't understand is how I can simplify this fraction when there is a variable D in the denominator. How can I take 2d out of 12 if I don't know what d is?.

And so overall, the net electric field would be 0?
 
  • #10
shqiptargirl said:
Okay I think I figured it out. If I expanded ##E = k \frac{-12q}{2d^2} ## I'd get ##E = k \frac{-12q}{2d*2d} ## which would simplify to -3?

The thing I don't understand is how I can simplify this fraction when there is a variable D in the denominator. How can I take 2d out of 12 if I don't know what d is?.
You don't simplify further when you have different variables. You just reduce to simplest terms, which in this case for for the expression in question is

## k \frac{-3q}{d^2}##

Lo and behold, that just happens to be the negative of the first term of the sum! A fine (no doubt intentional) coincidence.
And so overall, the net electric field would be 0?
Yes indeed :)
 
  • #11
Thank you so much for all your help! I understand it now ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
872