1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding the electric potential difference?

  1. Sep 21, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Please don't do the problem for me, but explain to me in detail each steps I should take and why in my calculations (so I didn't include any numbers).

    There's an insulating infinite cylinder of equal charge distribution at origin (density given- rho). Let's say it's radius is a. Then some radius outwards, there's another charged conducting cylindrical shell (given linear charge density- lambda) that encloses the original cylinder with some thickness. It's inner surface is at a distance (radius) b from the origin, and its outer surface c from the origin.

    I basically need to find V(c) - V(a), the pot. diff at surface of insulator, to outer surface of the shell.

    2. Relevant equations

    V(r) = V(r) - V(inf) = INT[E.dl] from inf to r.
    E = lamda/ (2pi e0 r)
    Area of circle: pi r^2

    3. The attempt at a solution

    So the potential specifically for inf. cylinders should be something like:
    V(r) = lamda/ (2pi e0) INT[1/r dr] from inf to r.

    Since rho is useless, I'll have to change it into lambda, by multiplying rho by the area of the cross-sectional circle of the cylinder, (pi a^2). Then we can now view the insulating cylinder as a thin wire at the origin (along z-axis) with lambda = rho*pi*a^2.

    to find V(c)-V(a), we must do multiple integrals.
    for V(c),
    INT[E.dl]<from inf to c>

    for V(a),
    INT[E.dl]<from inf to c> + INT[E.dl]<from c to b> + INT[E.dl]<from b to a>.
    INT[E.dl]<from c to b> should be 0 because the E-filed within the conductor is 0.

    so V(c)-V(a) = -INT[E.dl]<from b to a>.
    = -lamda/ (2pi e0) INT[1/r dr] from b to a, where lambda as we found is rho*pi*a^2.

    = -(rho*a^2)/(2 e0) * (ln(a)-ln(b))

    ...but apparently I'm wrong D: What did I do wrong, how should I have done it and why??
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 21, 2012 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    From scratch:
    1. exploit the symmetry of the situation ... change to cylindrical polar coordinates.
    2. use [itex]\epsilon_0 \nabla^2\phi=\rho_{free}[/itex]

    But you can finesse it using known results.
    1. the field inside a charged conducting surface is zero - so the potential is a constant
    2. the field outside a long cylinder of charge is the same as a line of charge through the origin - you should have a solution for that.
    3. the superposition principle.
    4. the field is the gradient of the potential.

    So,
    V(a) is that due to a line of charge through the origin + a constant.
    V(c) is that due to a superposition of two lines of charge.

    Is that what you are trying to do?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook