I Finding the Fresnel coefficients from interface conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the limit conditions for an interface in order to derive the Fresnel coefficients for both TE and TM polarized electric fields. The user seeks clarification on applying conditions such as E2-E1=0 and D2-D1=sigma, particularly regarding the presence of surface charge between media. They express urgency due to an upcoming exam and initially request assistance but later mention they found a solution. The thread also includes a suggestion to post the full problem with visuals for better understanding. Overall, the user is eager for help with their studies in physics.
Cathr
Messages
67
Reaction score
3
I'm studying for an exam (so this is existential) and I never really got how to write the limit conditions for an interface.

In my problem, there is an incident electric field, and there are two cases:
1) the field is polasised perpendicularly to the incidence plane (TE)
2) polarised in the plane (TM)

Here I must be able to correctly apply the limit conditions, to find the Fresnel formulas that give the amplitudes of the electric fields Er (reflected), Et (refracted) as a function of: Ei (incident field amplitude), ai (I meant so say alpha i, the angle of incidence) and ar (angle of refraction) and the constants that caracterise the environment for the two polarisations TE and TM.

The conditions are like E2-E1=0 or D2-D1=sigma (surface charge between media - how do we know there's any??) etc. I would like to know where they come from and how to be sure I'm writing them correctly and what they imply. Many many thanks in advance!

Sorry if my english doesn't quite fit your expectations. Eagerly waiting for your responses, if something's not clear please ask.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi

I think it might be helpful if you post the full problem with all possible pictures of the scenario you are talking about.
 
BPHH85 said:
Hi

I think it might be helpful if you post the full problem with all possible pictures of the scenario you are talking about.

I already found a solution, thank you! I might as well delete the thread. But, if you don't mind, please look at my other post on thermodynamics. I have an exam tomorrow and I would be really grateful if someone could help!
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top