Is Snell's law incompatible with interface conditions? What went wrong?

  • I
  • Thread starter Ngineer
  • Start date
  • #1
64
1

Summary:

Snell's law stipulates that n1/n2 = sin(th2)/sin(th1). That does seem to hold true?
Hi everyone,

Someone posted this hypothetical problem on a facebook group and I am wondering what your thoughts are.

The issue is that Snell's law does not seem to hold when applied to the transmitted wave (calculated using the electromagnetic interface conditions.) Here is an example:

Suppose we have an interface at y=0 between vacuum (medium 1; n1 = 1) and a material of εr = μr = 10 (medium 2; n2 = 10).

246059

For a plane electromagnetic wave whose electric field is given by the green arrow, we subsequently have:

246061

And a propagation direction along E1xH1:
246062


which corresponds to an angle of 36.87 degrees.

Using the interface conditions, we find that in the second medium, E2 has a unit vector of (x+ 0.132y), and that H2 is in a direction identical to H1 (i.e. z).
This gives rise to a propagation direction of
k2 = -0.132x + y

Which corresponds to an angle of 82.47 degrees.

Now the problematic issue is:
sin(theta2) / sin(theta1) = sin(82.47)/sin(36.87) = 1.65
Whereas
n1/n2 = 1/10 = 0.1.

Doesn't Snell's law stipulate that they're equal? What went wrong?
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
7,527
2,115
I don't understand how you determined E2 and H2: "Using the interface conditions, we find that in the second medium, E2 has a unit vector of (x+ 0.132y), and that H2 is in a direction identical to H1 (i.e. z). "
 
  • #3
64
1
Hi Andy,
E1 = 5V/M * [0.6,0.8] = [3,4,0] V/M
Using the conditions for continuity at the interface:
E2x = E1y = 3
E2y = E1y * (epsilon1/epsilon2) = 4 * 1/10 = 0.4
So E2 = [3, 0.4, 0] V/M
= 3.02 V/M * [ 0.991, 0.1321, 0 ]
For H2,
H1 = [0,0,5/377] A/M Hence H2z = H1z * meu1/meu2 = 0.5/377 A/M

(This got me even wondering, how does the continuity stipulate that H1z = H2z = 5/377 A/M, when due to propagation we require H2z = 3.02/377 A/M!)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
7,527
2,115
One error: n = √(ε_r μ_r), so if n = 10 and μ_r = 1 (valid for dielectrics), then ε_r = 100.
 
  • #5
64
1
One error: n = √(ε_r μ_r), so if n = 10 and μ_r = 1 (valid for dielectrics), then ε_r = 100.
For the second medium, εr = μr = 10
 
  • #8
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,092
803
Did you consider the reflected wave?
 
  • #9
64
1
Did you consider the reflected wave?
Thanks! that was probably it!
 

Related Threads on Is Snell's law incompatible with interface conditions? What went wrong?

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
209
Replies
7
Views
556
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
875
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Top