Finding the initial velocity and time period of a projectile

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the initial velocity and time of flight for a projectile, specifically an arrow aimed at hitting an apple at a certain height and distance. The problem involves kinematic equations and projectile motion concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various trajectories and the possibility of multiple solutions for the initial velocity. There are attempts to derive equations based on given parameters and constraints. Questions arise regarding the minimum velocity needed to hit the target and how different angles affect this value.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have offered equations and insights into maximizing certain variables, while others are questioning the assumptions and constraints of the problem. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack certain constraints, leading to discussions about the variability of minimum velocities for different angles. The original poster mentions limited information provided in the problem statement.

Wisal
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the Fig.
What should be the initial velocity (magnitude and direction) of the arrow? Also calculate the time of flight.
10996590_972978676065348_864850896699954934_n.jpg
10996590_972978676065348_864850896699954934_n.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have formulated 2 equations:
v*cos(theta) * t = 20
and 3 = (v * Sin(theta) * t) + (9.81 * t^2)/2
when t = time of flight
and v = initial velocity

I have further gone to a final equation
v = (2000+2000(tan(theta))^2)/ (3 + 20 Tan(theta))
Any help please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think there is only one way to hit the apple?
 
Well, intuitively speaking, I think that this problem will have a range of values as we can hit the apple along a variety of trajectories.
 
That's correct. So, could you clarify what you are trying to calculate? For example, there will be a minimum value of v for which you can hit the apple.
 
But won't there be an optimal solution to this, the solution that takes the least time? I mean the value of v that takes the least time?
 
Wisal said:
But won't there be an optimal solution to this, the solution that takes the least time?

There's not really going to be a least time, as the least time will be for the fastest v.

I think there would be a longest time, associated with the lowest possible velocity.
 
Oh yes! How stupid of me to ask :P But how will we find the lowest value of v?
 
Wisal said:
Oh yes! How stupid of me to ask :P But how will we find the lowest value of v?

Are you sure you are not missing a constraint from the problem? It's quite tricky to calculate the lowest v to hit a point above the ground.
 
well the problem, unfortunately, in front of me only gives this information. I think that there will be different minimum velocity for every possible angle. Am I right? and how do we find the range of angles possible?
 
  • #10
Wisal said:
well the problem, unfortunately, in front of me only gives this information. I think that there will be different minimum velocity for every possible angle. Am I right? and how do we find the range of angles possible?

I'm pretty sure it's not the problem you're supposed to be doing, but if you want a challenge.

First step is to express the trajectory as a (parabolic) function. Here's the formula. Try to derive this:

##y = xtan\theta - \frac{gx^2}{2v^2}sec^2\theta##
 
  • #11
I have already done that:
I formulated two equations:
1. vCosθ * t = 20
as x =20
2. 3 = vSinθ(t) + g(t^2)/2
as y =3 and then substituting the value of 't' i.e. 20/vcosθ in the second equation
 
  • #12
Okay, but remember g = -9.81 in your equations.

If you're trying to minimise v, then you need to maximise ##\theta## which is the same as maximising ##tan\theta##. Note that ##sec^2\theta = tan^2\theta + 1##

So, aim for a quadratic equation in ##tan\theta##.
 
  • #13
Okay, that's what I have reached at:

is the answer 89.7 degrees?
 
  • #14
And also could you tell me the intuitive reason why we took g as -9.81( I am sometimes confused by this). I do get why we took this value in this particular problem as we had to get a maximum value of tanθ hence we get a parabola with a maximum point.

And, am I right in thinking that there will be a different minimum velocity for every possible angle?
 
  • #15
Wisal said:
Okay, that's what I have reached at:

is the answer 89.7 degrees?
That can't be correct.
 
  • #16
y = xtanθ - (gx^2 secθ^2)/2 Comment: as we take g =- 9.81 so negative sign)
2y = 2xtanθ-gx^2secθ^2
2y = 2xtanθ-gx^2-gx^2(tanθ)^2
2y+gx^2=2xtanθ-gx^2(tanθ)^2
now plugging in the values: x = 20; y =3
2(3) +(9.81*400)=2(20)tanθ-(9.81*400)(tanθ)^2
now by substituting any variable say 'x' as tanθ
-3924x^2 + 40 x - 3930 = 0
Then differentiating it and putting that to zero and getting the value of x to be 196.2 and then using tanθ = 196.2 and then finding out the value of θ.
 
  • #17
I might have led you astray! We need to maximise the quadratic function for a given v. And, if the maximum value is y, we have the minimum value for v. It's not maximising theta. We need to maximise:

##f(\theta) = xtan\theta - \frac{gx^2}{2v^2}(1 + tan^2\theta)##

I told you it was tricky!
 
  • #18
But is not the 'y'(vertical displacement) always constant as the displacement will always be 3 no matter what? I mean the final displacement will be 3. Thanks for the help :D
 
  • #19
Wisal said:
But is not the 'y'(vertical displacement) always constant as the displacement will always be 3 no matter what?

That's not the point. Suppose we fire the arrow at a velocity v. That function gives the height at x for a given ##\theta##. So, first we calculate the maximum height at x for a given v (for any ##\theta##).

If that maximum height happens to be y (=3 in this case), then we have found the minumum v. Think about it. If we could hit (x, y) with a lower velocity than v, then we could hit a higher point (x, something higher than y) at velocity v.

In other words, at the minimum v, we can only just hit the target. And no higher.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K