Finding the intergral function (dQ/dt) = kQ

  • Thread starter Thread starter miniradman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation dQ/dt = kQ and finding its integral. The initial solution presented was Q = Aekt, but there was confusion regarding an intermediate step where the user incorrectly wrote Q = ekt + ec, which is not valid due to the properties of exponents. Participants clarified that the correct integral is ln|Q|, not ln(Q), and highlighted the importance of proper algebraic operations with indices. The user expressed gratitude for the corrections and acknowledged a minor spelling error in the title. Overall, the solution was deemed correct after addressing the mistakes in notation and understanding of logarithmic functions.
miniradman
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the integral (I think I'm finding the integral) of:
\frac{dQ}{dt} =kQ

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I just got feedback from my teacher, and he told me I make a mistake somewhere in this question. But I don't know where I've gone wrong?

\frac{dQ}{dt}=kQ
\frac{dQ}{Q}=kdt
∫\frac{dQ}{Q}=∫kdt
lnQ=kt+c
Q=ekt+ec
Where ec is a constant, so let ec=A
Q=Aekt

∴ Q=Aekt

Can anyone see where I've gone wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you substitute your solution back into the differential equation, the LHS equals the RHS, so the solution is fine. However, you wrote in an intermediate calculation that Q = ekt + ec. It can't be an addition. Try and think why it can't be an addition.

Hint: What are rules for algebraic operations with indices?

You made the same mistake in your next post.
 
oh... Kt + c will have to go to

ekt+c
ektx ec

right?
 
Yup, I can't see any other mistakes. This answer should score full marks now.
 
awesome!

Thanks man, I owe you one
 
Technically, there is one other error. The integral, \int (1/Q)dQ= ln|Q|, not ln(Q).
 
ahhh... ok, thanks for that
 
Minor point: there is no such word as "intergral" in the English language. Seeing as you have started two threads with this in the title, I thought I should point it out.
 
Sorry, I have terrible spelling :frown:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K