Finding the inverse Laplace transform

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to find the inverse Laplace transform of the function 1/[s(s² + 4)²]. The discussion revolves around the application of inverse Laplace transform techniques, particularly focusing on the use of partial fractions and the convolution theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of partial fractions to decompose the function and question the validity of the original attempt at the solution. There is also mention of the convolution theorem as a potential method, though it is noted that it may complicate the process.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the correct form for the partial fraction decomposition, indicating that the original poster is on the right track. There is acknowledgment of the need for a linear term in the numerator for quadratic terms in the denominator. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to refine the approach without reaching a final conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly applying the rules for inverse Laplace transforms, particularly regarding the linearity of the transform and the structure of the decomposition. There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions related to the setup of the problem.

Rubik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the inverse Laplace transform of the following function
1/[s(s2 + 4)2]


Homework Equations


1/ (s2 + [itex]\omega[/itex]2)2 = (1/ 2[itex]\omega[/itex]3) (sin[itex]\omega[/itex]t -[itex]\omega[/itex]t cos[itex]\omega[/itex]t)


The Attempt at a Solution


L-1 = (1/s) (1/ s2 +22)2
= (1/16) (sin 2t - 2t cos 2t) as the Laplace transform of (1/s) = 1

Is this what I am meant to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inverse Laplace transform of a product isn't the product of the inverse Laplace transforms in general. You can go for the convolution theorem (might be a mess), or use partial fractions to decompose that, which requires you to use a few other inverse identities once you get the decomposition.
 
Right.. how silly of me, so doing it by partial fractions I got 0=B=C and A= 1/16
giving me F(s) = (1/16)(1/s) does that seem a little more on track?
 
Well using partial fractions is definitely on track. But remember that when you have a quadratic term in the denominator, you have to have a linear term in the numerator (plus, it's squared, so there are going to be two.) The form for the expansion should be:

[tex]\frac{1}{(s)(s^2+4)^2} = {\frac{A}{s}} + \frac{Bs + C}{s^2 +4} + \frac{Ds + E}{(s^2+4)^2}[/tex]

Give that a shot.
 
Last edited:
Okay after that I am now getting A = 1/16, B = -1/16, C = 0, D = -1/4, E = 0.

(1/16)(1/s) - (1/16)(s/[s2 + 4]) - (1/4)(s/(s2 + 4)2
 
That looks good! Now that you have those, you can invert them term-by-term since the inverse Laplace transform is linear, so [itex]\mathcal{L}^{-1}(af(t)+bg(t)) = a\mathcal{L}^{-1}(f(t)) + b\mathcal{L}^{-1}(g(t))[/itex] for constants [itex]a[/itex] and [itex]b[/itex].
 
Thank you so much! :D
 
You're welcome! :biggrin:
 
There is a standard result: if f(t) <---> g(s), then integral_{x=0..t} f(x) dx < ---> g(s)/s.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K