Finding the inverse metric tensor from a given line element

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the inverse metric tensor from a given line element defined as dS2 = (dx1)² + (dx2)² + 4(dx1)(dx2). The presence of cross terms indicates a non-orthogonal system, leading to the expression of the metric tensor as a 2x2 matrix. The challenge lies in determining the coefficients corresponding to the cross terms in the equation. There is confusion regarding whether the matrix has been successfully identified or not. Clarification on the status of the matrix and the coefficients is needed for further progress.
Sayak Das
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Defining dS2 as gijdxidxj and
given dS2 = (dx1)2 + (dx2)2 + 4(dx1)(dx2). Find gijNow here is my take on the solution: Since the cross terms are present in the line element equation, we can say that it's a non-orthogonal system. So what I did was express the metric tensor in form of a 2x2 matrix, and checked the corresponding coefficient in the equation. But I am having a problem getting to the cross terms, and how to find the corresponding coefficients to the metric tensor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't g^{ij} just the inverse of the 2x2 matrix representing g_{ij}?
 
Sayak Das said:
Defining dS2 as gijdxidxj and
given dS2 = (dx1)2 + (dx2)2 + 4(dx1)(dx2). Find gijNow here is my take on the solution: Since the cross terms are present in the line element equation, we can say that it's a non-orthogonal system. So what I did was express the metric tensor in form of a 2x2 matrix, and checked the corresponding coefficient in the equation. But I am having a problem getting to the cross terms, and how to find the corresponding coefficients to the metric tensor.
So did you figure out the matrix or not? In the second sentence, you say you found it, but in the third, you imply that you did not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
816
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K