MHB Finding the Linear Equation Relating Price and Number of Widgets Sold

woof123
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Okay here's the question:

If you sell widgets for 2 dollars, you sell 300 per day. If you sell them for 4 dollars, you sell 200 per day. assume linear relat., between price (x) and # widgets sold per day (y), write linear equation relating x and y

I'm thinking I plot the x,y pairs, then calculate slope and the y intercept in order to put it into y=mx+b form...does that make sense?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have two points on the graph, so you can compute the slope as follows:

$$m=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$$

Then, you can use either point (I'll use the first), and the slope you computed, in the point-slope formula:

$$y=m(x-x_1)+y_1$$ :D
 
Equivalently, any linear function can be written y= ax+ b for numbers a and b. The fact that y(2)= 300 means that 2a+ b= 300. The fact that y(4)= 200 means that 4a+ b= 200. Solve those two equations for a and b.

(An obvious point is that there is "b" with coefficient 1 in both equations. Subtracting one equation from the other eliminates b leaving a single equation for a. Do you see that this is the same as your formula for slope? And then using that value of a in one of the two equations to find b is the same as MarkFL suggests.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top