Finding the meaning of a limit using a graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter ttpp1124
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Limit
Click For Summary
To find the meaning of a limit using a graph, it's essential to review the concept of limits and understand the behavior of the function at specific points. The discussion highlights that the limit at x = -2 is related to the derivative of the function, but it does not exist due to differing one-sided limits as h approaches zero. This indicates that the function is not differentiable at that point. Participants emphasize the importance of avoiding duplicate questions in threads. Understanding derivatives and one-sided limits is crucial for evaluating limits accurately.
ttpp1124
Messages
110
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The graph is a separate image (it didn't print with the worksheet for some reason). I filled in the blanks, but I wasn't sure how to approach part b)
Relevant Equations
n/a
IMG_3899.jpg
Screen Shot 2020-04-26 at 7.40.33 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ttpp1124 said:
I filled in the blanks, but I wasn't sure how to approach part b)

I should think that you can find the meaning of that expression in your calculus book. As for the value, you will probably need to review limits in order to evaluate it properly.
 
Imagine you have small, tiny, values for h, (both positive and negative?). Then look at the graph and see what that formula would give. The formula is in the form of "the rise over the run" at a particular value of x. Do you know what value of x it is located at? Do you know what that leads to?
 
I suggest you look up "derivatives and sharp turns" for the meaning and value at x= -2.
 
You posted the same question in a new thread. This was your answer in that thread.
ttpp1124 said:
My answer for 12b:
If the limit exists, it’s the derivative of 𝑓 at 𝑥=−2. But, the limit doesn’t exist. To see this, calculate the one-sided limits as h approaches zero from the right, and from the left. They both exist, but they are not the same, so the limit does not exist, meaning 𝑓 is not differentiable at 𝑥=−2
Correct, but please don't start a new thread for the same question. I have deleted the new thread.
 
I worry that perhaps they meant to write h→0+. Or maybe that's the trap you avoided.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K