Finding the minimum and maximum distances using Lagrange Multipliers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Lagrange multipliers to find minimum and maximum distances, specifically addressing the relationship between distance and its square. Participants explore the implications of maximizing the squared distance versus the distance itself.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of maximizing the squared distance, noting the differences between distance and its square. Some suggest that while the values differ, the points at which they are maximized or minimized are the same.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between the squared distance and the distance itself. There is recognition of the potential for different behaviors at stationary points in the original versus squared problems, particularly when considering functions that can take negative values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the original function's range, particularly in relation to the distance problem, where the function is non-negative.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=47774&stc=1&d=1338346735.png


What I don't understand is why you can maximize the distances squared - d2. Isn't d2 different from d? I don't see how they can get you the same value.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    16.3 KB · Views: 870
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
theBEAST said:

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=47774&stc=1&d=1338346735.png


What I don't understand is why you can maximize the distances squared - d2. Isn't d2 different from d? I don't see how they can get you the same value.

They don't have the same values (unless they happen to be 0 or 1), but they are maximized or minimized at the same points (x,y,z). Think about it: how could it be otherwise?

RGV
 
Last edited:
Letting distance be "D", so we can distinguish it from the differential, "d", [itex]d(D^2)/dt= 2D (dD/dt)= 0[/itex]. If D itself is not 0, [itex]d(D^2)/dt[/itex] will be 0 if and only if [itex]dD/dt[/itex] is 0.
 
Ray Vickson said:
They don't have the same values (unless they happen to be 0 or 1), but they are maximized or minimized at the same points (x,y,z). Think about it: how could it be otherwise?

RGV

As HallsofIvy has pointed out, the stationary points are the same in both problems. However, if the original f can take both negative and positive values, a min in the squared problem can be a saddle point in the original problem (eg: f(x) = x^3 has a saddle point at x = 0 but g(x) = f(x)^2 = x^6 has a global minimum at x = 0) and a min in the original problem can be a max in the squared problem, etc. None of these issues arise if the original f is >= 0, as it is in the distance problem you cite.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K