Finding the minimum of an integral with Lagrange multipliers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on minimizing an integral using Lagrange multipliers, specifically addressing the integral $$\int_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} (y + \lambda) \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} d \tau$$. The participants derive equations using the Euler-Lagrange (E-L) equations and explore the implications of isoperimetric constraints. A key insight is the suggestion to use the x-coordinate as the curve parameter and apply the Beltrami identity, leading to the conclusion that the variational problem is equivalent to the differential equation $$c' \frac d {d \tau} \left( \frac {dy}{dx} \right) = 1$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange multipliers in calculus of variations
  • Familiarity with Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of the Beltrami identity
  • Basic differential equations and integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange multipliers in variational problems
  • Learn about the Euler-Lagrange equations in detail
  • Explore the Beltrami identity and its implications in calculus of variations
  • Investigate the relationship between isoperimetric constraints and variational calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working on optimization problems, particularly those involving calculus of variations and differential equations.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Homework Statement
I have to minimize the integral
$$\int_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} y \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} d \tau$$
with the isoperimetrical condition
$$\int_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} = c$$
where ##c## is a constant.
Relevant Equations
Euler-Lagrange equations.
Using Lagrange multiplier ##\lambda## (only one is needed) the integral to minimize becomes
$$\int_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} (y + \lambda) \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} d \tau = \int_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} F(x, x', y, y', \lambda, \tau) d\tau $$
Using E-L equations:
$$\frac {\partial F}{\partial x} - \frac d {d \tau} \frac {\partial F}{\partial x'} = 0 - \frac d {d \tau} \left( (y+\lambda) \frac {x'}{\sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2}} \right) = 0$$
$$\frac {\partial F}{\partial y} - \frac d {d \tau} \frac {\partial F}{\partial y'} = \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} - \frac d {d \tau} \left( (y+\lambda) \frac {y'}{\sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2}} \right) = 0$$
$$\frac {\partial F}{\partial \lambda} - \frac d {d \tau} \frac {\partial F}{\partial \lambda'} = \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} - 0 = 0$$
If I sum the equation for ##y## and ##\lambda## I get:
$$\frac d {d \tau} \left( (y+\lambda) \frac {y'}{\sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2}} \right) = 0$$
Integrating the first equation I get:
$$(y+\lambda) \frac {x'}{\sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2}} = \text{const.} \rightarrow y+\lambda = \frac {\sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2}} {x'}$$
Putting together these last two equations I get:
$$\frac d {d \tau} \left( \frac {y'}{x'} \right) = \frac d {d \tau} \left( \frac {dy}{dx} \right) = 0$$
which is wrong!

I think I'm missing something fundamental because it is a pretty straightforward exercise.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For isoperimetric constraints, ##\lambda## is just a number, not a function to be varied with respect to.

I suggest you use the x-coordinate rather than path length as your curve parameter and apply the Beltrami identity.
 
Last edited:
Orodruin said:
For isoperimetric constraints, λλ\lambda is just a number, not a function to be varied with emrespect to.
Dumb me... o:)o:) Thank you! ( btw I noticed that in my original post I wrote ##x## instead of ##\lambda##... nice deduction!)

Orodruin said:
I suggest you use the x-coordinate rather than path length as your curve parameter and apply the Beltrami identity.
I just need to show that this variational problem is equal to the differential equation:
$$c' \frac d {d \tau} \left( \frac {dy}{dx} \right) = 1$$
where ##c'## is an other constant.
Putting the first equation into the second and integrating:
$$\text{const} \frac {y'}{x'} = \int_{\tau_1}^{\tau_2} \sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2} d \tau = c$$

So, I'd say the two problems are equivalent if and only if ##\frac {\tau_2 - \tau_1} {c'} = \frac {c} {\text{const}}##. What do you think ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K