Finding the Minimum Speed of a Particle with Given Position Function

Click For Summary
The position function of a particle is given by r(t) = <2t, 3, -2t+1>, leading to the velocity vector v(t) = <2, 0, -2>. The speed, calculated as the magnitude of the velocity vector, is √8, indicating a constant speed. Since the speed is constant, it achieves both minimum and maximum values at all times. Thus, the minimum speed is the same as the constant speed of the particle.
user8899
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The position function of a particle is given by r(t) = <2t, 3, -2t+1> where t is the time in seconds. When is the speed a minimum? What is the minimum speed?

Homework Equations



v(t) = r'(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



The derivative of r'(t) = 2 + 0 + (-2) = 0. The t is canceled out so how are we supposed to find t and the minimum speed? I am so confused. Help please?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
user8899 said:

Homework Statement



The position function of a particle is given by r(t) = <2t, 3, -2t+1> where t is the time in seconds. When is the speed a minimum? What is the minimum speed?

Homework Equations



v(t) = r'(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



The derivative of r'(t) = 2 + 0 + (-2) = 0.

No, the derivative should be a vector. If ##r(t) = \langle a(t), b(t), c(t)\rangle##, then ##r'(t) = \langle a'(t), b'(t), c'(t) \rangle##. You don't sum ##a'(t)##, ##b'(t)##, and ##c'(t)##.
 
Ok, so I would just get <2,3,-2>. Then what would I do?
 
user8899 said:
Ok, so I would just get <2,3,-2>. Then what would I do?

Speed = magnitude of velocity.
 
user8899 said:
Ok, so I would just get <2,3,-2>. Then what would I do?
The second component should not be 3.
 
jbunniii said:
The second component should not be 3.
Yea sorry it's <2,0,-2>
 
Ray Vickson said:
Speed = magnitude of velocity.
So the speed is 0? How do we find the time then? That's what I am stuck on.
 
user8899 said:
So the speed is 0?
No, it's not. He meant the magnitude (i.e. the norm) of the vector, not the magnitude of the sum of its components.
 
Fredrik said:
No, it's not. He meant the magnitude (i.e. the norm) of the vector, not the magnitude of the sum of its components.

I am really confused now. Could you give me some guidance?

So the derivative is velocity right? The magnitude of the vector would be √((2)^2 + (-2)^2)? Then that would be speed which is √8?

Is this right?

Thanks
 
  • #10
Yes, that's right.
 
  • #11
Fredrik said:
Yes, that's right.

Thanks, so for time what would I do since when you find the derivative t is no longer there?
 
  • #12
user8899 said:
Thanks, so for time what would I do since when you find the derivative t is no longer there?
You have shown that the speed is constant, so it achieves both a minimum and a maximum at all times.
 
  • #13
jbunniii said:
You have shown that the speed is constant, so it achieves both a minimum and a maximum at all times.

oh! okay that makes sense! Thank you everybody :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K