Finding the natural frequency of a cylinder oscillating on a circular surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the natural frequency of a cylinder oscillating on a circular surface, with specific focus on the rotational dynamics involved. The participants highlight the importance of incorporating the cylinder's rotation (ωc) and the correct application of the parallel axis theorem to accurately determine the kinetic energy. Key errors identified include missing factors in energy equations and the need to differentiate between energy and moment methods. The consensus is that a thorough understanding of rotational energy and proper equation formulation is essential for solving the problem correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and energy equations
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia concepts
  • Basic calculus for differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the parallel axis theorem in rotational dynamics
  • Learn how to derive the natural frequency of oscillating systems
  • Explore the differences between energy methods and moment methods in mechanics
  • Practice solving problems involving kinetic energy of rotating bodies
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics and oscillatory motion, will benefit from this discussion.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the problem with my 3 attempts:
LVGDf.jpg


1. Alright, so the first attempt, I did not take into account the rotation of the cylinder ωc so I think it is wrong. But it seems to make sense because the whole cylinder rotates about O, so if I find that energy using parallel axis theorem it should get me the correct answer?

2. Here I said the energy from the cylinder is due to the rotational energy of the cylinder itself and also the velocity of the cylinder. I think this one is correct, what do you guys think?

3. I am not sure how to use moment to solve for the natural frequency. For some reason it gave me the same answer as 1. which I think is wrong. Is this one correct?

I know this is a long question, but if anyone could give me some insight on whether or not I did it right, it would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first equation in (1) is missing a factor 1/2 on the θ2, but it appears in the following line. As you say, the energy expression is incomplete, missing the rotational energy. There are several ways to express the total KE. E.g. you can consider the cylinder as rotating about its point of contact with the dish and use the parallel axis theorem. In this view, there is no other KE term.
Writing down the energy equation then differentiating doesn't seem to me to be using the 'energy method'. That transforms it into moment method. You could get the equation into the form θ-dot = etc. then do a trig substitution to integrate.
(2) is the better effort, but it seems to me you have again lost the factor 1/2 on the θ2, and this time it does not reappear.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K