Finding the nth Term of a Sequence: 6+13+24+39+...

  • Thread starter Thread starter roshan2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Term
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the nth term of the sequence 6, 13, 24, 39, where participants note that there is no unique sequence beyond four terms without additional assumptions. The differences between the terms form an arithmetic progression, leading to the conclusion that the sequence can be expressed using Newton's divided difference formula. This formula reveals that the nth term can be represented as a quadratic equation, specifically 2n^2 + 5n + 6. Clarification is sought regarding whether the inquiry pertains to the nth term of the sequence or the nth partial sum of the series. The conversation emphasizes the importance of context in determining the correct approach to the problem.
roshan2004
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
How to find nth term of the sequence 6+13+24+39+...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can't. There is no unique sequence longer than 4 giving rise to that set of numbers.
You need to make some sort of assumption about what sort of sequence you have there.

i.e. if you put x0=6, x1=13, x2=24, and x3=39; then the nth term could be (2n)6: n=even, and 13n: n= odd. BUt if I'm going to do that, then I could just say that x(n) = x(n-2)+18: n=even, x(n)=x(n-2)+26: n=odd ;)

note: what have the + signs to do with it?
 
Last edited:
It is actually 6,13,24,39...Their differences are in Arithmetic progression
 
It is only "actually" if you restrict possible generation rules to a limited subset.
Or do you mean that you want to know how to write that particular rule out in some compact way?
Please make the question clear - you appear to be relying on a context we don't have.

Perhaps you want the sequence generation rule in terms of something like x(n)=... ?
 
roshan2004 said:
It is actually 6,13,24,39...Their differences are in Arithmetic progression
Any reason why you didn't tell us that before? As Simon Bridge said, there are infinitely many different sequences that start out "6, 13, 24, 39". We might have noticed that 13- 6= 7, 24- 13= 11, 39- 24= 15 so that the "second differences" are 11- 7= 4 and 15- 11= 4 but there is no way of knowing that is always true without being told.

Knowing that the first differences are always 4 (so second and succeeding differences are 0) we can use "Newton's divided difference formula" which is very similar to "Taylor's series" for continuous functions. If a sequence, {a_n} has first differences \Delta_n, second differences \Delta^2_n, etc. then a_n= a_0+ \Delta_0 n+ (\Delta_0^2/2) n(n-1)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ (\Delta_0^i/i!)n(n-1)(n-2)\cdot\cdot\cdot(n- i- 1)

In this case, with a_0= 6, a_1= 13, a_2= 24, a_3= 39, \Delta_0= 7, \Delta_1= 11, \Delta_2= 15, and continuing so that \Delta^2_i= 4 for all i, then all higher differences are 0 and Newton's formula becomes
6+ 7n+ (4/2)n(n-1)= 6+ 7n+ 2n^2- 2n= 2n^2+ 5n+ 6

That is a_0= 2(0^2)+ 5(0)+ 6= 6
a_1= 2(1^2)+ 5(1)+ 6= 2+ 5+ 6= 13,
a_2= 2(2^2)+ 5(2)+ 6= 8+ 10+ 6= 24,
and a_3= 2(3^2)+ 5(3)+ 6= 19+ 15+ 6= 39 as desired.

Notice that, because I chose to simplify by starting the sum at i= 0, the "nth term" is
2(n-1)^2+ 5(n-1)+ 6= 2n^2- 4n+ 2+ 5n- 5+ 6= 2n^2+ n+ 3
so that a_1= 2(1)+ 1+ 3= 6, a_2= 2(4)+ 2+ 3= 13, a_3= 2(9)+ 3+ 3= 24, and a_4= 2(16)+ 4+ 3= 39.

You could also have done this by recognizing from the start that (as a result of Newton's divided difference formula) since the second differences are constant, the formula must be quadratic in n:
an^2+ bn+ c and then use the values given to find a, b, and c.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
roshan2004 said:
nth term of the sequence 6+13+24+39+...

Do you mean "nth term of the sequence" 6,13,24,39,... or "nth partial sum of the series" 6+13+24+39...?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top