Finding the particular anti derivative when given f'(x) and TWO f(value)s

  • Thread starter Thread starter skyturnred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the particular anti-derivative of a function given its derivative f'(x) = x^(-1/3) and two specific function values, f(1) = 1 and f(-1) = -1. The discussion centers around the implications of these conditions on the uniqueness of the anti-derivative.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the confusion arising from different values of the constant of integration when applying the given conditions. There is an exploration of the piecewise nature of the function due to the undefined point at f(0).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining the implications of the derivative not being defined at zero and how this affects the uniqueness of the anti-derivative. Some guidance has been offered regarding the piecewise representation of the function.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint regarding the behavior of the function at x = 0, which leads to the consideration of multiple branches for the anti-derivative. The uniqueness of the anti-derivative is questioned in the context of points where the function is not defined.

skyturnred
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the question directly from the book:

f'(x)=x^(-1/3), f(1)=1, f(-1)=-1, find f(x).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So there are about ten of these types, and I am very confused. I am confused because if you solve for f(x) with f(a) you get a different value for c than if you solved for f(b).

So finding f(x) I get f(x)=(3/2)x^(2/3) + c
If I make f(x)=1 and x=1, I get the value of c to be -1/2
But if I make f(x)=-1 and x=-1, I get the value of c to be -5/2..

Thank you so much for your help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that f(0) is not defined. So you actually have two branches. So your function can be described as

[tex]f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}(3/2)x^{2/3} + c_1 ~\text{if}~x>0\\ (3/2)x^{2/3} + c_2 ~\text{if}~x<0 \end{array}\right.[/tex]
 
Notice that f(0) is not defined. So you actually have two branches. So your function can be described as

f(x)={(3/2)x2/3+c1 if x>0(3/2)x2/3+c2 if x<0

So whenever f'(0)=DNE, the function f(x) can be written as a piecewise function?
 
skyturnred said:
So whenever f'(0)=DNE, the function f(x) can be written as a piecewise function?

Indeed!

Do notice that you proved that the anti-derivative of a function is unique up to a constant. But you only proved that for functions that exists everywhere on an interval. If a function does not exist in a point, then the result isn't true anymore!
 
micromass said:
Indeed!

Do notice that you proved that the anti-derivative of a function is unique up to a constant. But you only proved that for functions that exists everywhere on an interval. If a function does not exist in a point, then the result isn't true anymore!

OK, thanks again! You helped tremendously.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K