Finding the velocity of a proton at the surface of a conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a proton released from rest at a distance of 10 meters from a charged conducting sphere with a radius of 30 cm and a charge of -50 nC. The correct approach involves using the conservation of energy principle, specifically the relationship W = qΔV = 1/2mv², where ΔV is the potential difference experienced by the proton as it moves toward the sphere. The participants clarify that the potential difference should be calculated using the potentials at the two distances (10 m and 0.3 m) due to the sphere's charge, leading to a corrected velocity calculation. When the sphere's charge is switched to +50 nC, the same method applies, but the potential values will differ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and potential difference (V = kq/r)
  • Familiarity with conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy equations (1/2mv²)
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics and charge interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric potential and how it varies with distance from a charged object.
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in electrostatic systems.
  • Explore the effects of relativistic speeds on mass and energy calculations.
  • Investigate the implications of changing charge on electric fields and potential energy.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of charged particles in electric fields.

chococho
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charged conducting sphere with radius 30cm is having a charge of -50nC. A proton is released from rest at R= 10m. Calculate the velocity of the proton when it reaches the surface of the conductor. What happens to the velocity of the proton when the charge on the sphere is changed to +50nC?

Homework Equations



V = kq / r
W = qΔv = 1/2mv2

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I connected the potentials for the sphere and the proton:

Vsphere = k(-50nC) / 0.3 = -1500
Vproton = k(+q) / 10 = 1.44e-10

I'm pretty sure this part is where I'm wrong. But I added them up and used -1500 for ΔV.
Then I plugged in +q into W=qΔv equation, solved for v, and got 547722m/s as the answer.
I think I'm close, because it says the correct answer is 52e4 m/s, but I'm not sure where I've messed up.

For the second part where charge on the sphere is +50nC, do I just plug this number into Vsphere and do the same thing to get the velocity?

Any help is appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not completely following your process here -- are you using a conservation of energy approach, involving the kinetic energy of the proton?

It's a good start using potentials to calculate potential energy, but I'm not sure why you have a potential for both the sphere and the proton. To do a conservation of energy strategy here, you would want to calculate the change in the proton's potential energy as it moves toward the sphere, so that would involve the proton moving through different potentials due to the sphere. So what do you mean when you have ##V_{proton}##?

And when say you solved for v from the ##W = q\Delta V##, do you mean you also used a kinetic energy relationship? It looks like you mistook the ##\Delta V## for velocity, but I sure hope that isn't the case!
 
jackarms said:
I'm not completely following your process here -- are you using a conservation of energy approach, involving the kinetic energy of the proton?

yes.

jackarms said:
And when say you solved for v from the ##W = q\Delta V##, do you mean you also used a kinetic energy relationship? It looks like you mistook the ##\Delta V## for velocity, but I sure hope that isn't the case!

I set qΔV and 1/2mv2 equal to each other, and I used the potential I got for the sphere for ΔV.


I'm really not sure how to go about doing this problem... but am I on the right track with "qΔV = 1/2mv2" to find the velocity? How do I get ΔV?
 
Yes, that is the correct equation to use, it's just your calculation of ##\Delta V## that's off. Think of it instead in terms of:$$\Delta U = \Delta K$$where ##\Delta U## is the change in potential energy of the proton. Using the relationship ##\Delta U = q\Delta V##, you can see that the change in potential energy is proportional to the change in potential that the proton moves through. So think of the proton being at one potential created by the sphere at R = 10m, and then at another potential (still due to the sphere) at R = 0.30m. This will be your ##\Delta V##. And here you'll only use the equation you used for ##V_{sphere}##, since it's the proton moving through the sphere's electric field, not the other way around (although you could claim that the proton moving toward the sphere is equivalent to the sphere moving toward the proton, but let's keep things simple).
 
Are you saying find the potential at R=0.30m and at R=10m with -50nC as q for both of them to get delta V? And multiply by q again? Sorry, I'm a little confused.
 
Yes, that's right. The idea is that you find the potential due to the sphere at different points in space, using
$$V = k\frac{q}{r}$$
where ##q## here is the charge of the sphere. Then once you find the potential difference between two points in space (R = 10m and R = 0.30m), you use the formula
$$\Delta U = q\Delta V$$
where ##q## here is now the charge of the proton.

In a nutshell, the proton moves across a potential difference, and the energy lost/gained equals the potential times the charge.
 
Hm, I got 539444m/s... I guess I'm getting close?

So I got -45 (at R=10) and -1500 (at R=0.3), I did -45-(-1500) and got 1455 for delta V. Then I multiplied by 1.6e-19 to get delta U, which equals delta K. Did I mess up again?
 
I wonder does the mass of the proton increase slightly? Its speed passes 0.1% of the speed of light.
 
I'm not quite sure. The process is right, but I got a similar answer. I sure hope special relativity isn't involved, but even so we're off by a whole order of magnitude according to the answer -- it's on the order of 104, and our answers are on the order of 105. Both are so close to ~5.3 as a base though, so could the answer perhaps have a typo? Are you sure you have all the givens correct? I will double check the answer again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K