Finding the voltage in a non- series/parallel circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJBladester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Voltage
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the voltage VAB and power supplied by a source in a complex circuit. The user initially calculated VAB as 0.096 V, but circuit simulation indicated it should be 29.73 V. Key insights included recognizing that R4 does not contribute to the circuit and can be ignored, simplifying the analysis to a potential divider formed by R2 and R3. After applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and recalculating, the user found the correct current and power values, concluding with a power of -60 W. The realization that R4 was extraneous significantly clarified the problem-solving approach.
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Find VAB and the power supplied by the source.

circuit_problem.JPG


Homework Equations



\sum V=0 around a closed loop
V_x=\left (\frac{R_x}{R_T} \right )E
I_x=\left (\frac{R_T}{R_x} \right )I

The Attempt at a Solution



problem_5.jpg


I end up getting the correct equivalent resistance (40.64 Ω), source current (1.23 A), and source power (61.5 W). However, my result for VAB is .096 V but according to my circuit simulation software it should be 29.73 V. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you shorting out A and B? In the circuit you have shown, R4 is just dangling out there, not dissipating any power.
 
I haven't checked your attempt but did you notice that when calculating Vab you can:

1) ignore R1 (eg remove it because it's parallel with V1).
2) You can also short R4 because the current in R4 = 0

Redraw the circuit and you end up with a v. simple two resistor circuit with just R2 and R3 as a potential divider..

Vab = V1 * R3/(R2+R3)

= 50 * 220/(150+220)

= 29.73 V
 
To calculate the power apply KCL to the battery positive node.

Hint: Calculate the current flowing in R3 from Vab/R3.
 
No current flows through R4 so Vab is the same as the V across R3.
R2 and R3 form a potential divider
 
lewando said:
Why are you shorting out A and B? In the circuit you have shown, R4 is just dangling out there, not dissipating any power.

There was no reason for me to short A and B. It was my mistake. It appears that R4 is a red herring in this problem.

CWatters said:
...ignore R1 (eg remove it because it's parallel with V1)...

I think I have gotten to the solution. After thinking about what you both said, it was a much easier route than what I was attempting to do. The big aha moment was the realization that R4 was not contributing as it was "dangling" on the original circuit.

problem_5_revised.jpg
 
I would do it this way..

Apply KCL at the battery positive node..

Ibat + IR1+IR2 = 0
or
- Ibat = IR1+IR2

Note that with R4 open circuit then..
IR2=IR3=VR3/R3=29.73/220= 135mA

As R1 is in parallel with the 50V supply then..
IR1 = 50/47= 1.064A

Substitute these two values into the above

-Ibat = 1.064 + 0.135
= 1.199A call it -1.2A

Power = V * I
= 50 * -1.2
= -60W
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K