Finding Torque for Angular Momentum Parking Gate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating torque in the context of angular momentum for a parking gate scenario. Participants are exploring the relationship between torque, force, and distance, while addressing potential misunderstandings regarding the application of formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of torque using the formula Torque = r X F, while questioning the inclusion of different weights and distances. There are attempts to clarify whether individual calculations for different segments of the system are necessary.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the original poster's calculations, noting errors in the approach and suggesting that the moment of inertia was mistakenly considered instead of focusing solely on torque. There is an ongoing exploration of how to accurately account for the mass distribution and its effect on torque.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the attachment point of the bar and its implications for the effective weight and torque calculations. Participants are also addressing the potential for counter torque from different segments of the system.

Goofball Randy
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


x2bfH7J.png

Homework Equations



Torque = r X F

The Attempt at a Solution



r is 2.5m since that's the length of the red (minus 0.5), and F should be the weight, so ma? That gives something like (5 * 2.5/3) * 9.8 * 2.5, which doesn't give me an answer at all :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've included the weight of the short end, but as though it is at the mass centre of the long end.
 
haruspex said:
You've included the weight of the short end, but as though it is at the mass centre of the long end.

Do I need to calculate them individually? The correct answer here is 49, and I think my approach as a whole is wrong.
 
Goofball Randy said:
Do I need to calculate them individually? The correct answer here is 49, and I think my approach as a whole is wrong.
Yes, your error is more fundamental, I realized just after posting. You seem to be calculating moment of inertia, which is not what is asked for.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, your error is more fundamental, I realized just after posting. You seem to be calculating moment of inertia, which is not what is asked for.

Can you point out where? I thought I was calculating torque.
 
Goofball Randy said:
Can you point out where? I thought I was calculating torque.
You squared the distance and divided by 3. That happens the formula for the moment of inertia of a bar, but it is not in the (correct) equation you quoted.
 
haruspex said:
You squared the distance and divided by 3. That happens the formula for the moment of inertia of a bar, but it is not in the (correct) equation you quoted.

I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying I SHOULD be using inertia of a bar, I = 1/3 M r^2 ? Because right now I am literally just doing f = ma.
And if I need to use inertia, should I use the torque = Inertia * angular acceleration equation?
 
Goofball Randy said:
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying I SHOULD be using inertia of a bar, I = 1/3 M r^2 ? Because right now I am literally just doing f = ma.
And if I need to use inertia, should I use the torque = Inertia * angular acceleration equation?
No, I said the equation you quoted is correct:
Goofball Randy said:

Homework Equations



Torque = r X F
But that's not what you did here:
Goofball Randy said:
like (5 * 2.5/3) * 9.8 * 2.5, which doesn't give me an answer at all :(
Yiu have two factors of 2.5 and a divisor of 3. That looks like a moment of inertia calculation to me.
 
haruspex said:
No, I said the equation you quoted is correct:

But that's not what you did here:

Yiu have two factors of 2.5 and a divisor of 3. That looks like a moment of inertia calculation to me.

Oh!

It wasn't, that was a straight up r x F calculation. See, I was confused by the part where the bar is attached "0.5m from the end". So I figured that the actual mass would not be 5kg, but rather 5 * (2.5/3), since that would be the fraction of the bar that I'm actually looking at.
 
  • #10
Goofball Randy said:
Oh!

It wasn't, that was a straight up r x F calculation. See, I was confused by the part where the bar is attached "0.5m from the end". So I figured that the actual mass would not be 5kg, but rather 5 * (2.5/3), since that would be the fraction of the bar that I'm actually looking at.
Ok. In that case, your error is that you have treated the short end as simply not being there. It will produce a counter torque.
The easiest way is just to treat all the mass as being at the mass centre (which is valid for finding the effective weight).
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Ok. In that case, your error is that you have treated the short end as simply not being there. It will produce a counter torque.
The easiest way is just to treat all the mass as being at the mass centre (which is valid for finding the effective weight).

I see, how clever!

The mass center would be 1m away from the pole-thingy.

So torque = 1 * 5 * 9.8

= 49.

Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K