Finite subgroups of unique orders are normal

  • Thread starter Thread starter redone632
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Normal
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a finite group G and a subgroup H of order m, with the task of showing that H is normal in G if it is the only subgroup of that order. The context is within group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the properties of the subgroup xHx^{-1} and its relation to H, questioning whether it remains a subgroup and its order. There is exploration of the implications of H being the only subgroup of order m.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between xHx^{-1} and H, suggesting that since H is the only subgroup of order m, xHx^{-1} must equal H. However, there is still some uncertainty regarding the connections made in the reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions and properties of subgroups, particularly regarding their orders and the implications of uniqueness in subgroup orders. Participants are navigating through assumptions about element orders and subgroup characteristics.

redone632
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a finite group and H a subgroup of G having order m. Show that if H is the only subgroup of order m in G, then H is normal in G.


Homework Equations


A subgroup H of G is normal in G if and only if xHx^{-1} \subseteq H \forall x \in G


The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that H is the only subgroup of order m. Then elements in G\H cannot have order m.

If x \in H then clearly, xHx^{-1} \subseteq H

If x \notin H that is, x \in G \backslash H so |x| \neq m then ...

This is where I'm not seeing anything. Any help to point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is xHx^(-1) a subgroup? How many elements does it have?
 
Dick said:
Is xHx^(-1) a subgroup? How many elements does it have?

Since H is a subgroup of order m, xHx^(-1) will be a subgroup of order m. Since H is the only subgroup of order m there will be no other subgroup such that xKx^(-1) is of order m. Therefore, xHx^(-1) = H.

I think that's it, but I can't connect the dots to the last statement.
 
I don't see the problem. If xHx^(-1) is a subgroup of order m, and H is the ONLY subgroup of order m, then xHx^(-1) must be the same subgroup as H. What's K got to do with it?
 
Dick said:
I don't see the problem. If xHx^(-1) is a subgroup of order m, and H is the ONLY subgroup of order m, then xHx^(-1) must be the same subgroup as H. What's K got to do with it?

Oh wow, I swear I miss the most obvious things. Thanks for your help again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K