MHB Finite Tangent product / quotient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the identity involving the tangent function for real numbers and odd integers. It establishes that the ratio of tangent functions can be expressed as a product of specific tangent terms derived from the roots of the equation $\tan(m\theta) = \tan(mz)$. The proof utilizes the formula for $\tan(m\theta)$, which is based on de Moivre's theorem, and involves manipulating the roots to arrive at the desired equation. Participants acknowledge the elegance of the approaches used, particularly in relation to complex numbers. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical derivation and its implications in trigonometric identities.
DreamWeaver
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Just for fun, eh...? (Heidy)For $$z \in \mathbb{R}$$, and $$m \in 2\mathbb{N}+1$$, show that:$$\frac{\tan mz}{\tan z}=\prod_{j=1}^{ \lfloor m/2 \rfloor } \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}-z\right) $$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]The numbers $\theta = \frac{j\pi}{m}+z \ (-\lfloor m/2 \rfloor \leqslant j \leqslant \lfloor m/2 \rfloor)$ are the roots of the equation $\tan(m\theta) = \tan(mz).$ The formula for $\tan(m\theta)$ (for an odd number $m$) in terms of $t = \tan\theta$ is $$\tan(m\theta) = \frac{{m\choose1}t - {m\choose3}t^3 + {m\choose5}t^5 - \ldots + (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}t^m} {1 - {m\choose2}t^2 + {m\choose4}t^4 - \ldots + (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}{m\choose m-1}t^{m-1}}.$$ So the equation obtained by putting that expression equal to $\tan(mz)$ has roots $\tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \ (-\lfloor m/2 \rfloor \leqslant j \leqslant \lfloor m/2 \rfloor).$ Multiply out the fraction and the equation becomes $(-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}t^m + \ldots - \tan(mz) = 0.$ The product of the roots is the constant term divided by the coefficient of $t^m.$ Therefore $$\prod_{j=-\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor} \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) = (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}\tan(mz).$$ Now divide by the middle term of the product and pair off the remaining factors to get $$ (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}\frac{\tan(mz)}{\tan z} = \prod_{j=1}^{ \lfloor m/2 \rfloor } \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \tan\left(z - \frac{j\pi}{m}\right).$$ Finally, change the sign of the second of each of those pairs of factors. That will introduce $\lfloor m/2 \rfloor$ changes of sign, which will cancel with those on the left side of the equation and result in $$\frac{\tan mz}{\tan z}=\prod_{j=1}^{ \lfloor m/2 \rfloor } \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}-z\right).$$[/sp]
 
@ Opalg...

I used the standard definition of the tangent function in complex terms,

$$\tan \theta = \frac{e^{i\theta}- e^{-i\theta}}{ e^{i\theta}+ e^{-i\theta}}$$But your approach is far more elegant. Very nicely doen indeed! (Yes)
 
DreamWeaver said:
@ Opalg...

I used the standard definition of the tangent function in complex terms,

$$\tan \theta = \frac{e^{i\theta}- e^{-i\theta}}{ e^{i\theta}+ e^{-i\theta}}$$But your approach is far more elegant. Very nicely doen indeed! (Yes)
The formula that I used for $\tan(m\theta)$ comes straight from de Moivre's theorem, of course, so the complex numbers were definitely there in the background.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top