Other First post since 2009. I've learned a lot. Where to go from here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daytripper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Self study physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking advice for advancing in self-directed STEM education, particularly in physics. The individual has a solid foundation in special relativity, general relativity, and quantum mechanics, having pursued a non-physics STEM degree and continued studying these subjects independently. They express satisfaction with their understanding of these areas and have recently engaged with Max Tegmark's work, which aligns with their interpretation of physics. The user is contemplating exploring theories beyond the standard model, specifically loop quantum gravity (LQG), topological quantum field theory (TQFT), and twistor theory, but is uncertain about where to begin. They seek guidance on how to proceed with their studies and whether their interests are premature. The discussion emphasizes the importance of direction in self-study and the relevance of foundational knowledge when tackling advanced theories in physics.
daytripper
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
So I hope I'm posting in the right place. This is a request for advice on my STEM education but I have no immediate intention of attending university again (maybe one day). Rather, I'm requesting guidance on the future direction of my independently driven academics (i.e. "self-study").

I created this account back in 2005, while I was still in high school. I asked a bunch of questions, trying to wrap my head around SR (when I have time, I'm sure I'll get a good laugh by going back and reading what I wrote). I eventually figured that out and moved on to GR and QM and have gotten a pretty good handle on those things. In the meantime, I got a non-physics STEM degree, a job outside of physics, and continued to study math and physics in my spare time. There's still plenty for me to learn wrt GR and QM (more the latter than the former) but I'm satisfied with my grasp of them. I think the MWI paired with QFT and an extreme focus on the role of information and computable processes works very well. Finally gave in to the suggestions that I read Tegmark's book about the MUH and I've found the book to be a fairly precise explanation of my interpretation of physics (though it's been wonderful to read the additional insights he offers). I find that the holographic principle, AdS/CFT correspondence, the Beckenstein bound, the Landaurer principle, the delayed choice quantum erasure experiment, etc, etc all put writing on the wall that I can't quite read.

So my question: where to go from here? I'm thinking of diving into some of the theories beyond the standard model. I've heard that I should consider LQG, TQFT, and/or Twistor theory. But I'm not sure which of these I should start with. Given my background and preferred perspective, where should I begin my investigation forward? Am I getting ahead of myself?

Thanks in advance for any advice you can offer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you want to investigate BTSM theories in the first place?
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top