Fission Chain Reaction: Is it Possible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of fission chain reactions, particularly whether any matter can undergo fission consistently and sustainably. Participants explore concepts related to nuclear physics, including controlled reactions and the implications of energy release without explosions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the possibility of consistent fission in matter, questioning if it can occur without resulting in an explosion.
  • Others assert that nuclear fission is indeed possible, citing the existence of nuclear reactors and bombs as evidence.
  • A participant suggests the idea of a controlled chain reaction similar to that in nuclear power plants, distinguishing it from an explosive reaction.
  • Concerns are raised about the dangers of experimenting with radioactive materials, especially for those new to the field of nuclear physics.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of sustaining a fission reaction using a single radionuclide and the implications of half-life on this process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that nuclear fission chain reactions can occur, particularly in controlled environments like reactors. However, there remains uncertainty about the sustainability of such reactions and the conditions required for them to happen without explosive outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for safety measures when dealing with radioactive materials and the potential dangers associated with uncontrolled reactions. There are also references to the limitations of knowledge among some participants, particularly those new to nuclear physics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring nuclear physics, particularly those curious about the mechanics of fission reactions and the safety considerations involved in nuclear energy production.

kdrdgn07
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering that is it possible? I mean, certain radioactive matter can undergo fission? Sure I know half-life and radioactive decay. This question is asked roughly. I just learn is it possible? Thank you for answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done any reading about fission? Why would you doubt it? The hundreds of nuclear reactors in operation around the world, as well as the many nuclear fission bombs that have been exploded should be proof that, yes, matter can undergo fission.
 
phyzguy said:
Have you done any reading about fission? Why would you doubt it? The hundreds of nuclear reactors in operation around the world, as well as the many nuclear fission bombs that have been exploded should be proof that, yes, matter can undergo fission.

I don't mean it. I mean, Can any matter undergo fission consistenly when I stopped? I'm reading some books about nucleer physics but I'm rookie. I don't have enough information
 
kdrdgn07 said:
I don't mean it. I mean, Can any matter undergo fission consistenly when I stopped? I'm reading some books about nucleer physics but I'm rookie. I don't have enough information

"I"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kdrdgn07
kdrdgn07 said:
I don't mean it. I mean, Can any matter undergo fission consistenly when I stopped? I'm reading some books about nucleer physics but I'm rookie. I don't have enough information
I'm glad you stopped undergoing fission, and I hope you get to feeling better soon. :smile:
 
SteamKing said:
I'm glad you stopped undergoing fission, and I hope you get to feeling better soon. :smile:
Damn :D You know what ı wanted to say :D Why you are trolling bro :D Damn. :D
 
I can't speak for SteamKing, but personally I have no idea what you wanted to say. Seriously.
 
kdrdgn07 said:
Damn :D You know what ı wanted to say :D Why you are trolling bro :D Damn. :D
No, I don't know what you are trying to say. Frankly, it doesn't make any sense.
 
Really, I guess I don't know what I wanted to say Bro I don't know how I can explain that. I want to do like a chain nuclear bomb but Imagine that It's not bursting. Just occurring energy
 
  • #10
kdrdgn07 said:
Really, I guess I don't know what I wanted to say Bro I don't know how I can explain that. I want to do like a chain nuclear bomb but Imagine that It's not bursting. Just occurring energy
You mean a controlled chain reaction, like what happens in a nuclear power plant?
 
  • #11
It's major part of my project I can't explain sorry. But I need help about this issue. I don't know very well. Can we speak as private?
 
  • #12
Either you have to keep it private - then you should not write about it in messages to random strangers - or not, then you can discuss it here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kdrdgn07
  • #13
mfb said:
Either you have to keep it private - then you should not write about it in messages to random strangers - or not, then you can discuss it here.
Thank you but are you expert about this issue?
 
  • #15
kdrdgn07 said:
I'm reading some books about nucleer physics but I'm rookie. I don't have enough information

Hmmmm... rookie in what mean? rookie in physics or rookie in nuclear physics? In case of nuclear physics you can find an enormous # of introductory books either online or on sale.
Either way; a bomb is a bomb because it explodes [releases a great amount of energy in that short time]... afterall the explosion is that release of energy...
So envisioning to build a bomb that doesn't explode is senseless... not to say dangerous if you are a rookie on any field... especially if you are a rookie in physics, your vision could be from a childish dream up to a potential danger to yourself and the people around you [especially playing with radioactive material]. Humans are not supposed to let themselves subject to extra radiation from radioactive sources and certain dose-limits are set depending on your "job". Money is also a thing. If your project is not a personal thing but part of an academic research, where I believe the safety measures will be ensured by the institute or collaboration, you can ask for guidance from your supervisor/coordinator.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kdrdgn07 and berkeman
  • #16
Thank you, you are right. I'm rookie in nuclear physics. I just wanted to learn that is it possible. And they said it is possible. Thank you all of you.
 
  • #17
Guys please. He doesn't know English very well. Are you using Google Translate?

It is possible for nuclear fission chain reactions to take place. They happen every day in Nuclear Reactors. However, these reactions can go out of control and nuclear disasters can occur.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kdrdgn07
  • #18
Trontor said:
Guys please. He doesn't know English very well. Are you using Google Translate?

It is possible for nuclear fission chain reactions to take place. They happen every day in Nuclear Reactors. However, these reactions can go out of control and nuclear disasters can occur.
Thank you my bro.
 
  • #19
kdrdgn07 said:
Thank you, you are right. I'm rookie in nuclear physics. I just wanted to learn that is it possible. And they said it is possible. Thank you all of you.
Releasing a lot of power without an explosion is possible, nuclear reactors do that (with a power of the scale of GW = 109 W). Releasing much more power always gives an explosion, which ends the reaction quickly. Nuclear weapons have typical powers of 1021 to 1025 W, but just for a few microseconds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kdrdgn07
  • #20
mfb said:
Releasing a lot of power without an explosion is possible, nuclear reactors do that (with a power of the scale of GW = 109 W). Releasing much more power always gives an explosion, which ends the reaction quickly. Nuclear weapons have typical powers of 1021 to 1025 W, but just for a few microseconds.
So, is it sustainable? ı mean, can it be done nonstop? with only one radionuclides? i know half-life and other things, its simply consideration.
 
  • #21
  • #22
Thread is closed for Moderation...
 
  • #23
Thread will remain closed. We have answered the OP's question as best as we are able to.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Nuclear Fission of Uranium-235
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Fissionable elements for Fission
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Can Neutron-X Fusion Reactions Overcome the Repulsion Problem in Fusion Energy?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Undergrad Fission of 238U with high energy neutrons & other questions
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Undergrad Half life and radioactivity clarification
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
High School Shorter half-life and therefore very radioactive -- why?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Critical radius for nuclear reactions
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Undergrad How is the fission of Uranium to Europium possible?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Nuclear Fusion: Radioactive Decay?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Undergrad Fission caused by positrons - in a fission fragment rocket?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K