Fixed Point Theorem: Necessary & Sufficient Conditions for Convergence

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fixed Point Theorem, specifically seeking necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of sequences defined by a continuous function \( f \) that has a fixed point at \( a \). The original poster is exploring the implications of the Jacobian of \( f \) and its spectral radius in relation to the convergence of sequences generated by the function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of conditions for convergence, referencing the spectral radius of the Jacobian and its implications. There are attempts to relate the behavior of sequences to properties of the function and its derivatives. Questions arise regarding the sufficiency of the conditions and the implications of the Jacobian being non-invertible.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring both necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence. Some have provided reasoning based on the Jacobian's properties, while others express uncertainty about the sufficiency of the conditions discussed. There is a clear engagement with the mathematical concepts involved, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available and the assumptions that can be made about the function \( f \) and its derivatives.

Calabi
Messages
140
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let be ##f \in C^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{n}, \mathbb{R}^{n})## and ##a \in \mathbb{R}^{n}## with ##f(a) = a##. I'm looking for a suffisent and necessar condition on f that for all ##(x_{n})## define by ##f(x_{n}) = x_{n+1}##, then ##(x_{n})## converge.

Homework Equations


##f(a) = a##

The Attempt at a Solution



If all sequences define like this converge it's necessarly on a.
We've got the following result : if A is a complex matrix, then the seuqences define by ##X_{n+1} = AX_{n}## converge if and only if the spectral radius ##\rho{A} < 1##.

So I think we should care about the spectral radius of the jacobian of f.

By whrogting ##f(a + x_{n}) = a + df(a)x_{n} + ||x_{n}||\epsilon(x_{n})## but I get nothing.

Have you got an idea please?

Thank you in advance and have a nice afternoon:oldbiggrin:.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is necessar because if all sequences define by f converge it's in ##a## then We can choose ##(x_{n})## no stationnar if ##df(a)## is invertible : by the local reverse theorem we can find a neighbourhood ##V## of a with ##f_{|V} : V \rightarrow V## is injective then it is enough to choose ##x_{0} \in V - \{a\}##(then if for a certain n ##x_{n} = a## we easily show that necessarly ##x_{0} = a##.). so ##x_{n + 1} = f(a + x_{n} - a) = a + df(a).(x_{n} - a) + ||x_{n} - a||\epsilon(x_{n} - a)##(whith ##\epsilon(x) \rightarrow_{x \rightarrow 0} 0##.). ##\forall \epsilon > 0## we can choose n enough high as ##||x_{n} - a|| < \epsilon## and ##||x_{n+1} - a|| \leq ||x_{n} - a|| ##(indeed, by convergence hypothesis, ##\exists N \in \mathbb{N} | n > N \Rightarrow ||x_{n} - a|| < \epsilon##, then if forall n integer > N we have ##||x_{n+1} - a|| > ||x_{n} - a||## then it doesn't converge in 0 which is absurd.). so ##||\rho(df(a))|| ||x_{n} - a|| \leq |||df(a)||| ||x_{n} - a|| \leq ||x_{n + 1} - a|| + ||x_{n} - a|| ||\epsilon(x_{n} - a)|| \leq ||x_{n} - a|| + ||x_{n} - a|| ||\epsilon(x_{n} - a)||## so as ##(x_{n})## is not stationnar ##||\rho(df(a))|| \leq 1 + \epsilon## so ##||\rho(df(a))|| \leq 1##.
If the jacobian is non invertible I don't know.
 
Last edited:
But what about the suffisient condition please? Maybe it's wrong.
 
We can choose ##(x_{n})## no stationnar if ##df(a)## is invertible : by the local reverse theorem we can find a neighbourhood ##V## of a with ##f_{|V} : V \rightarrow V## is injective then it is enough to choose ##x_{0} \in V - \{a\}##(then if ##x_{n} = a## we easily show that necessarly ##x_{0} = a##.).
 
Could you help me?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K