B Flavour changing neutrinos and relevance to big bang

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter 1oldman2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Neutrinos
1oldman2
Messages
1,450
Reaction score
1,210
The following article is interesting to me, however particle physics is not one of my strong points, could anyone comment on it and its implications regarding the early universe? Thanks.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-36776167
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, they finally bothered to add slides to the conference website.

I think the BBC introduction does quite a good job. We expect that initially there was the same amount of matter and antimatter around. If they come together they annihilate. If matter and antimatter would be completely symmetric, nothing is left. But there is matter left - there has to be an asymmetry (called "CP violation" - details don't matter here), and we can calculate its strength based on the amount of matter that was left.
CP violation has been observed, first in 1964. The problem: the observed violation was tiny. We found it in a few more related places since 1964, but always too small.

The hope is now that neutrinos show larger CP violation. Unfortunately, neutrinos rarely interact with matter, so all those measurements are complicated, need large detectors and a lot of time. The result of NOvA has a weak hint of non-zero CP violation for neutrinos, but the measurment uncertainty is still very large.

@Orodruin is a neutrino expert.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
991
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Back
Top