MHB Flowerchild1993's question at Yahoo Answers regarding minimizing cost of fence

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus help! Word problem?

A rectangular field is to be enclosed on four sides with a fence. Fencing costs $3 per foot for two opposite sides, and $8 per foot for the other two sides. Find the dimensions of the field of area 770 ft squared that would be the cheapest to enclose.

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus help! Word problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello flowerchild1993,

Let's let $x$ be the length of one pair of sides, for which fencing costs $C_x$ in dollars per foot and $0$ be the length of the other pair of sides, for which fencing costs $C_y$ in dollars per foot. All measures and constants are positive.

The cost function is therefore:

$$C(x,y)=2C_xx+2C_yy$$

Let the area of the field be $A$, and so we have:

$$A=xy\,\therefore\,y=\frac{A}{x}$$

and so we may write the cost function in terms of one variable $x$:

$$C(x)=2C_xx+2AC_yx^{-1}$$

Now, to find the extrema, we differentiate with respect to $x$ and equate to zero:

$$C'(x)=2C_x-2AC_yx^{-2}=0$$

Multiplying through by $$\frac{x^2}{2}$$ we may arrange this as:

$$x^2=\frac{AC_y}{C_x}$$

Taking the positive root, we find:

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{AC_y}{C_x}}$$

And so:

$$y=\frac{A}{\sqrt{\frac{AC_y}{C_x}}}=\sqrt{\frac{AC_x}{C_y}}$$

This is why I used variables to denote the constants of the problem...we can now see how the dimensions of the field will change with respect to changes made to any of the constants. We see that if $C_x$ increases then $x$ will decrease and $y$ will increase, etc. We also see that:

$$\frac{x}{y}=\frac{C_y}{C_x}$$

This ratio also tells us how the dimensions will vary based on the costs.

Using the second derivative test for relative extrema, we find that:

$$C''(x)=4AC_yx^{-3}>0$$ for $$x>0$$ which we have assumed, and so we know this critical value is at a minimum.

Now it's just a matter of using the given data to find the required dimensions. Let's let $x$ be the pair of sides with the cheaper fencing, so we have:

$$C_x=3,\,C_y=8,\,A=770$$

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{770\cdot8}{3}}=\frac{4\sqrt{1155}}{3}$$

$$y=\sqrt{\frac{770\cdot3}{8}}=\frac{\sqrt{1155}}{2}$$

To flowerchild1993 and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization problems here in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top