MHB Flowerchild1993's question at Yahoo Answers regarding minimizing cost of fence

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the optimal dimensions for a rectangular field with an area of 770 square feet to minimize fencing costs, with two sides costing $3 per foot and the other two sides costing $8 per foot. The cost function is derived and simplified to express it in terms of a single variable. By differentiating the cost function and applying the second derivative test, the minimum cost dimensions are calculated. The resulting dimensions are approximately x = 4√1155/3 and y = √1155/2. This mathematical approach provides a clear solution to the problem posed by Flowerchild1993.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus help! Word problem?

A rectangular field is to be enclosed on four sides with a fence. Fencing costs $3 per foot for two opposite sides, and $8 per foot for the other two sides. Find the dimensions of the field of area 770 ft squared that would be the cheapest to enclose.

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus help! Word problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello flowerchild1993,

Let's let $x$ be the length of one pair of sides, for which fencing costs $C_x$ in dollars per foot and $0$ be the length of the other pair of sides, for which fencing costs $C_y$ in dollars per foot. All measures and constants are positive.

The cost function is therefore:

$$C(x,y)=2C_xx+2C_yy$$

Let the area of the field be $A$, and so we have:

$$A=xy\,\therefore\,y=\frac{A}{x}$$

and so we may write the cost function in terms of one variable $x$:

$$C(x)=2C_xx+2AC_yx^{-1}$$

Now, to find the extrema, we differentiate with respect to $x$ and equate to zero:

$$C'(x)=2C_x-2AC_yx^{-2}=0$$

Multiplying through by $$\frac{x^2}{2}$$ we may arrange this as:

$$x^2=\frac{AC_y}{C_x}$$

Taking the positive root, we find:

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{AC_y}{C_x}}$$

And so:

$$y=\frac{A}{\sqrt{\frac{AC_y}{C_x}}}=\sqrt{\frac{AC_x}{C_y}}$$

This is why I used variables to denote the constants of the problem...we can now see how the dimensions of the field will change with respect to changes made to any of the constants. We see that if $C_x$ increases then $x$ will decrease and $y$ will increase, etc. We also see that:

$$\frac{x}{y}=\frac{C_y}{C_x}$$

This ratio also tells us how the dimensions will vary based on the costs.

Using the second derivative test for relative extrema, we find that:

$$C''(x)=4AC_yx^{-3}>0$$ for $$x>0$$ which we have assumed, and so we know this critical value is at a minimum.

Now it's just a matter of using the given data to find the required dimensions. Let's let $x$ be the pair of sides with the cheaper fencing, so we have:

$$C_x=3,\,C_y=8,\,A=770$$

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{770\cdot8}{3}}=\frac{4\sqrt{1155}}{3}$$

$$y=\sqrt{\frac{770\cdot3}{8}}=\frac{\sqrt{1155}}{2}$$

To flowerchild1993 and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization problems here in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K