MHB Flowerchild1993's question at Yahoo Answers regarding minimizing cost of fence

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the optimal dimensions for a rectangular field with an area of 770 square feet to minimize fencing costs, with two sides costing $3 per foot and the other two sides costing $8 per foot. The cost function is derived and simplified to express it in terms of a single variable. By differentiating the cost function and applying the second derivative test, the minimum cost dimensions are calculated. The resulting dimensions are approximately x = 4√1155/3 and y = √1155/2. This mathematical approach provides a clear solution to the problem posed by Flowerchild1993.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus help! Word problem?

A rectangular field is to be enclosed on four sides with a fence. Fencing costs $3 per foot for two opposite sides, and $8 per foot for the other two sides. Find the dimensions of the field of area 770 ft squared that would be the cheapest to enclose.

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus help! Word problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello flowerchild1993,

Let's let $x$ be the length of one pair of sides, for which fencing costs $C_x$ in dollars per foot and $0$ be the length of the other pair of sides, for which fencing costs $C_y$ in dollars per foot. All measures and constants are positive.

The cost function is therefore:

$$C(x,y)=2C_xx+2C_yy$$

Let the area of the field be $A$, and so we have:

$$A=xy\,\therefore\,y=\frac{A}{x}$$

and so we may write the cost function in terms of one variable $x$:

$$C(x)=2C_xx+2AC_yx^{-1}$$

Now, to find the extrema, we differentiate with respect to $x$ and equate to zero:

$$C'(x)=2C_x-2AC_yx^{-2}=0$$

Multiplying through by $$\frac{x^2}{2}$$ we may arrange this as:

$$x^2=\frac{AC_y}{C_x}$$

Taking the positive root, we find:

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{AC_y}{C_x}}$$

And so:

$$y=\frac{A}{\sqrt{\frac{AC_y}{C_x}}}=\sqrt{\frac{AC_x}{C_y}}$$

This is why I used variables to denote the constants of the problem...we can now see how the dimensions of the field will change with respect to changes made to any of the constants. We see that if $C_x$ increases then $x$ will decrease and $y$ will increase, etc. We also see that:

$$\frac{x}{y}=\frac{C_y}{C_x}$$

This ratio also tells us how the dimensions will vary based on the costs.

Using the second derivative test for relative extrema, we find that:

$$C''(x)=4AC_yx^{-3}>0$$ for $$x>0$$ which we have assumed, and so we know this critical value is at a minimum.

Now it's just a matter of using the given data to find the required dimensions. Let's let $x$ be the pair of sides with the cheaper fencing, so we have:

$$C_x=3,\,C_y=8,\,A=770$$

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{770\cdot8}{3}}=\frac{4\sqrt{1155}}{3}$$

$$y=\sqrt{\frac{770\cdot3}{8}}=\frac{\sqrt{1155}}{2}$$

To flowerchild1993 and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization problems here in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top