Fluid dynamics in physics grad programs

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the intersection of fluid dynamics and physics graduate programs, particularly the integration of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) within these programs. Participants explore the availability of graduate programs that explicitly focus on CFD as a distinct research area, as well as the potential for interdisciplinary studies that include CFD in fields such as soft condensed matter and astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a desire to find physics or applied physics graduate programs that include CFD as a separate research area, noting that it often appears within broader fields like soft condensed matter or computational astrophysics.
  • Others argue that CFD has become more of a methodological approach rather than a standalone research field, similar to experimental and theoretical physics.
  • There is a suggestion that many graduate programs may not explicitly list CFD as a research area but may include computational work within various physics departments.
  • Some participants highlight the flexibility within graduate studies, suggesting that one could pursue a Ph.D. in a specific area (like vortex dynamics) while also engaging in CFD-related consultancy work.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicability of CFD in certain fields, such as string theory, while noting its relevance in areas where hydrodynamics is central.
  • Several participants mention specific institutions, like UC Santa Cruz and UC Berkeley, as having relevant research in CFD, particularly within their math and applied math departments.
  • There is a discussion about the skills required for CFD work in industry, emphasizing that while specific algorithms may vary by field, the general ability to work with complex code is crucial.
  • One participant mentions the importance of fluid modeling in critical applications, such as nuclear weapon reliability, highlighting the broader implications of CFD expertise.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of graduate programs that focus specifically on CFD. There are multiple competing views regarding the nature of CFD as a research area and its integration within physics graduate studies. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to pursue CFD within a physics context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the availability of CFD as a distinct research area and the potential need for interdisciplinary approaches. There is also mention of varying applicability of CFD across different fields of physics, which may affect program selection.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective graduate students interested in fluid dynamics, computational methods, and their applications in physics and engineering may find this discussion relevant.

creepypasta13
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
So basically I'm considering applying to physics or applied physics grad programs. But I'm also considering doing CFD as a career. I was hoping there was a way I could see them both in a grad program, but I haven't seen any physics grad programs with CFD as a research area by itself. Rather, I see it in soft condensed matter, computational astrophysics, etc instead. Are there any grad programs that combines physics and has CFD as a separate research area?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
creepypasta13 said:
Rather, I see it in soft condensed matter, computational astrophysics, etc instead. Are there any grad programs that combines physics and has CFD as a separate research area?

Usually what happens is that you have schools in which CFD or high performance computing is set up as an interdisciplinary group. CFD is so large a field that people tend to specialize in one part of it.
 
creepypasta13 said:
So basically I'm considering applying to physics or applied physics grad programs. But I'm also considering doing CFD as a career.

I don't see any problem in doing both together. The way I see it, CFD is, or has become, a study approach rather than a research field by itself. Same as experimental and theoretical physics.
 
twofish-quant said:
Usually what happens is that you have schools in which CFD or high performance computing is set up as an interdisciplinary group. CFD is so large a field that people tend to specialize in one part of it.
So you're saying that I should just apply to any physics grad program I'm interested in, as they should have some research group doing computational work, which is where I can do CFD if I wish to?

HossamCFD said:
I don't see any problem in doing both together. The way I see it, CFD is, or has become, a study approach rather than a research field by itself. Same as experimental and theoretical physics.
The only industrial/applied aspect I'm interested in is the aerodynamics aspect. But I'm also interested in the theoretical side, such as vortices. Since I see more areas of research that interest me in physics depts, but not AE/ME, I thought I should apply to physics grad schools.

Are you also saying I could just do research in any field of physics, but just join a research group doing lots of computational work?
 
creepypasta13 said:
Are you also saying I could just do research in any field of physics, but just join a research group doing lots of computational work?

Not any field of physics would deal with CFD. I don't see how you would apply CFD in string theory research for instance. But many of them, which tackle problems in which Hydrodynamics is central, do.

Like I said in the other post, there is a degree of flexibility. So while you do a Ph.D in vortex dynamics, you can still have some consultancy employment in industrial cyclones simulations.
 
HossamCFD said:
Not any field of physics would deal with CFD. I don't see how you would apply CFD in string theory research for instance. But many of them, which tackle problems in which Hydrodynamics is central, do.

Like I said in the other post, there is a degree of flexibility. So while you do a Ph.D in vortex dynamics, you can still have some consultancy employment in industrial cyclones simulations.

the areas of physics I'm mostly looking into are atomic, molecular, optical, and (hard) condensed matter. Maybe astrophysics as well, but I didn't take any undergrad classes in that.

I would like to do a phD in those but still have the option of doing CFD work in industry (preferably for defense/aerospace work) after graduating
 
Well, for a school suggestion, I can say that the University of California Santa Cruz does research in CM and CFD. They also have a really good Astrophysics program. I don't think their physics department it's self does research in CFD, but the math and applied math departments are involved in CFD and asto CFD. I believe that UC Berkeley also has some asto CFD work done in their physics and/or math departments. If you're looking at CFD, I've noticed that more math departments do that than physics.

I think in general CFD isn't a research area by it's self as you have to be computing the fluid dynamics of something. I know there's a journal of fluid mechanics/rheology, so you could look up some articles in that and see where the people writing them are located. Also, another field that CFD is used in is Plasma Physics if that interests you. CFD in Plasma Physics (which is generally in the realm of Magnetohydro Dynamics) is what I'm looking to go to grad school for.

Links:
http://www.physics.ucsc.edu/research/index.html
http://www.math.ucsc.edu/research/index.html
http://www.ams.ucsc.edu/research/areas
 
rhombusjr said:
Well, for a school suggestion, I can say that the University of California Santa Cruz does research in CM and CFD. They also have a really good Astrophysics program. I don't think their physics department it's self does research in CFD, but the math and applied math departments are involved in CFD and asto CFD. I believe that UC Berkeley also has some asto CFD work done in their physics and/or math departments. If you're looking at CFD, I've noticed that more math departments do that than physics.

I think in general CFD isn't a research area by it's self as you have to be computing the fluid dynamics of something. I know there's a journal of fluid mechanics/rheology, so you could look up some articles in that and see where the people writing them are located. Also, another field that CFD is used in is Plasma Physics if that interests you. CFD in Plasma Physics (which is generally in the realm of Magnetohydro Dynamics) is what I'm looking to go to grad school for.

Links:
http://www.physics.ucsc.edu/research/index.html
http://www.math.ucsc.edu/research/index.html
http://www.ams.ucsc.edu/research/areas

Yes, I know CFD is done in applied math, but I'm more interested in physical aspects of problems than the math, so I don't think applied math programs are for me. I don't need to be in a dept where CFD is a research area by itself. I just want to pick a dept, hopefully in physics, where I can pick up the skills of CFD if I wish to, so that way I can be employable if I go into CFD after getting a phD in physics.
 
creepypasta13 said:
I would like to do a phD in those but still have the option of doing CFD work in industry (preferably for defense/aerospace work) after graduating

The skills industry people look for in CFD is pretty field non-specific and the people that are have experience in CFD are rare enough so that people look across fields when hiring. Within academia, the specific algorithms and techniques are pretty field specific. For example in aerospace, you have simple flow conditions but complex boundary conditions. In astrophysics, it's the opposite. However, if you have general ability to work with complex code, then learning different algorithms isn't very difficult.

Also CFD is pretty useful in other areas. When interest rates are high, then options become "convective" which means that you have to worry about numerical instabilities that you normally don't have to worry about.

Also, modelling fluids correctly seems to be extremely critical for getting a hydrogen bomb to work. This is important for world peace. It becomes much easier to control the spread of nuclear weapons if there is a global ban on testing nuclear bombs, and the major powers are not going to agree to stop testing nuclear weapons unless they have computer codes that can give them some reliance that their bombs still work. Once you can't test nuclear bombs, it becomes extremely difficult for countries that don't have weapons to figure out how they work.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
twofish-quant said:
The skills industry people look for in CFD is pretty field non-specific and the people that are have experience in CFD are rare enough so that people look across fields when hiring. Within academia, the specific algorithms and techniques are pretty field specific. For example in aerospace, you have simple flow conditions but complex boundary conditions. In astrophysics, it's the opposite. However, if you have general ability to work with complex code, then learning different algorithms isn't very difficult.

Really? That sounds like what I want to hear! I would love to do computational research in solid-state or astrophysics, yet still have opportunities to get an industrial job in CFD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K