Fluid Dynamics - Using the Manometer Equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
dylanwalt
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The two water reservoirs shown in the figure are open to the atmosphere. The water has a density of 1.00 Mg/m°.
A u-shaped tube between the reservoirs contains incompressible mercury with a density of 13.60 Mg/m'.
The difference in height, d, of the mercury on either side of the u-shaped tube is 25.0 cm as shown.
What is the difference in elevation h?
Relevant Equations
(delta)P=pg(delta)h
I tried to use this equation, so I isolated the delta h because that is what im solving for and then I thought because the pressure on both ends of the reservoir is both atmospheric pressure the change in pressure is 0. This makes my entire equation 0 and thus height is 0 which is definitely not the case.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0771.jpg
    IMG_0771.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 177
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the two reservoirs as the right hand side and left hand side of an equation. In this instance the equation for pressure. You would put mercury's pressure on the right hand side.

P_h + Px + P25 = Pmerc + Px
 
Last edited:
dylanwalt said:
Homework Statement: The two water reservoirs shown in the figure are open to the atmosphere. The water has a density of 1.00 Mg/m°.
A u-shaped tube between the reservoirs contains incompressible mercury with a density of 13.60 Mg/m'.
The difference in height, d, of the mercury on either side of the u-shaped tube is 25.0 cm as shown.
What is the difference in elevation h?
Relevant Equations: (delta)P=pg(delta)h

I tried to use this equation, so I isolated the delta h because that is what im solving for and then I thought because the pressure on both ends of the reservoir is both atmospheric pressure the change in pressure is 0. This makes my entire equation 0 and thus height is 0 which is definitely not the case.
You appear to be using Bernoulli's between 1 and 3? While not wrong...it's not going to get you anywhere. You have to think about the pressures at the various points in the manometer. You can relate these from surface ##\enclose{circle}{\text{1}}## to surface ##\enclose{circle}{\text{3}}##.
 
Yes it is clear to me, I worked it out. I used the idea that the pressure on the left is equal to the pressure on the right because the system is in equilibrium and then placed all the values in and got an answer of 3.15 meters.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller, osilmag, Steve4Physics and 1 other person
dylanwalt said:
Yes it is clear to me, I worked it out. I used the idea that the pressure on the left is equal to the pressure on the right because the system is in equilibrium and then placed all the values in and got an answer of 3.15 meters.
Welcome, @dylanwalt !

For homework questions, we require you to show your attempt to resolve the problem.

Another way to see it:
A hydrostatic pressure able to create a 0.25-meter column of mercury, will be able to induce a [(13.60 / 1.00) x 0.25]-meter column of water (which is not equal to answer C).
 
Lnewqban said:
A hydrostatic pressure able to create a 0.25-meter column of mercury, will be able to induce a [(13.60 / 1.00) x 0.25]-meter column of water (which is not equal to answer C).
To avoid possible confusion, it's worth noting that the question asks for the value of ##h##. But ##h## is not the length of a "[(13.60 / 1.00) x 0.25]-meter column of water".

So, unless I'm misunderstanding something, the OP has the correct answer (C, 3.15m in Post #5).

Minor edit made.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: haruspex and erobz