Fluid mechanics: calc the acceleration of a particle at a point.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the constant B in the given velocity field to ensure it represents incompressible flow. Participants highlight the need to apply the condition that the divergence of the velocity field must equal zero, leading to the relationship between the derivatives of the velocity components. The calculations reveal that setting the derivatives equal allows for solving B, with a derived value of B = 1.2/2. Additionally, the acceleration of a fluid particle at the specified point (2, 1) is to be calculated, along with the component of acceleration normal to the velocity vector. The conversation emphasizes the importance of linking velocity changes to maintain incompressibility in fluid mechanics.
Zarathuztra
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A velocity field is given by \vec{V}= [Ax^{3} + Bxy^{2}]\hat{i} + [Ay^{3} + Bx^{2}y]\hat{j}; A=0.2 m^{-2}s^{-1}, B is a constant, and the
coordinates are measured in meters. Determine the value and
units for B if this velocity field is to represent an incompressible
flow. Calculate the acceleration of a fluid particle at point
(x, y)=(2, 1). Evaluate the component of particle acceleration
normal to the velocity vector at this point.

Homework Equations



u=\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial y} v=-\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the above equation to get value equations u and v, there is something I'm missing, a bit of reasoning that has to be made using the given information to determine a constraint that exists since the fluid is incompressible. This should link the rates of change to each other. But that's where I get stuck, having trouble hanging on to all the concepts..

u = [2Bxy]\hat{i} + [.6y^{2} + Bx^{2}]\hat{j}
v = -[.6x^{2} + By^{2}]\hat{i} - [2Bxy]\hat{j}

Assumptions:
1. Incompressible flow
2. B is constant
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Incompressible" links the derivatives of the velocities in both directions.
This gives you one constraint and allows to calculate B.
 
so du = -dv? increases of u lead to decreases of v.
 
Not du = -dv, but du/dx = -dv/dy (or the other way round?) should work.
 
when I try \frac{du}{dx} = -\frac{dv}{dy} I get

[2By]\hat{i} + [2Bx]\hat{j} = [2By]\hat{i} + [2Bx]\hat{j}

which doesn't help solve for B, unless I'm messing up somewhere or forgetting something.
The same happens when I take \frac{du}{dy} = -\frac{dv}{dy}

[2Bx]\hat{i} + [1.2y]\hat{j} = [1.2x]\hat{i} + [2By]\hat{j}
 
The second equation can be solved for B.
 
I'm getting B = 1.2/2
does that look right?
 
I think so. It solves the equations for i and j at the same time, which looks good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K