Fluid Mechanics introductory book

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for introductory fluid mechanics books from a physics perspective, as well as experiences with fluid mechanics courses and research proposals. Participants share their insights on resources suitable for different levels of mathematical understanding and the challenges faced in learning fluid mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for introductory fluid mechanics books, emphasizing a physics viewpoint and affordability.
  • Another participant suggests a DVD by G. Homsy et al. as a valuable resource for understanding fluid mechanics from a physics perspective.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessary mathematical background, with one participant noting that vector calculus is essential for comprehending most fluid mechanics texts.
  • A participant with vector calculus experience expresses a desire for a more in-depth resource than their introductory textbook, which only covers basic principles.
  • A participant shares their experience with a final year research proposal in fluid mechanics, expressing confusion over their supervisor's comments regarding dimensional and non-dimensional parameters.
  • A graduate student recounts their first exposure to fluid mechanics, recommending the Feynman Lectures on Physics as an excellent introductory resource, while cautioning against more advanced texts like Fetter and Walecka's book.
  • The same graduate student mentions that many fluid dynamics textbooks are overly complex or intended as references rather than teaching tools, citing specific examples such as Pedlosky's work.
  • There is a suggestion that a solid understanding of particle mechanics and continuum limits is beneficial before tackling fluid mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best resources for learning fluid mechanics, with no consensus on a single recommended book. There is also a lack of agreement on the necessary mathematical background, as some participants emphasize its importance while others suggest that certain resources may be accessible with basic knowledge.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges of learning fluid mechanics, noting that many recommended texts may be too advanced for beginners. The discussion also reflects differing levels of familiarity with the subject matter, which may influence the suitability of various resources.

Opus_723
Messages
175
Reaction score
3
I'm in first-year physics classes and we just wrapped up our solitary chapter on fluid mechanics, which covered the very basics (pressure, Archimedes' Principle, and Bernoulli's equation). I find this more interesting that the classical mechanics we've been doing up till now, so I was wondering what a good introductory book would be. Note that I'm looking at this from a Physics perspective, as opposed to what an engineer might be looking for. Also, cheap would be nice. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about books, but there is a DVD by G.Homsy et al which is really great and explains a lot of the fluid mechanics from a physics viewpoint. I used it when studying my Fluid Mechanics course and it was excellent.
 
It depends on your math skills - you say you're a first year Physics student, so chances are you don't know enough math . If you don't have the proper mathematical background (such as vector calculus) most books will look impenetrable.
 
I've taken vector calculus. If that's all that's needed, I shouldn't have a problem. But I don't need to be an expert, I'm just looking for something more in-depth than the single chapter on Archimedes' and Bernoulli's Principle in my freshman intro book.
 
I am doing my final year research proposal on fluid mechanics. I have submit my proposal to my supervisor then he had reply me with some comment but i do not understand what he really want . Here are what he ask:

1. All dimensional quantities should be shown , at least for a realistic.

2 non dimensional parameters should be shown, at least for a realistic.
(example of parameter Pr number ,porosity number, Hartman, Schmidt no ... )

please help me on this , i have shown him all the parameter and dimensional quantities like velocity ,stress and ... but he said this is not he want . I really do not have idea what he want pls help .
Thank Thank Thank a lot .
 
I'm a first year graduate student, and last semester was my first exposure to real fluid mechanics (i.e., beyond the basics of pressure, volume, temperature that you study in thermodynamics with regards to equilibrium ideal gasses). Basically this was a treatment of the Navier-Stokes equation (both viscous and inviscid) and the Boussinesq approximation. The class was first year graduate Mechanics, and it was taught out of Fetter and Walecka's Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua. I would NOT recommend this book if you want to teach yourself--it's super tough to read and the problems are very challenging.

Before getting to fluid mechanics in class, though, we had to pick a topic for a final project. The topic I (stupidly) picked was deriving and simulating the equations of two-dimensional fluid flow in a plane subject to a coriolis force--i.e. the "beta plane approximation" you find in meteorology. So my research would be classified as "Geophysical fluid dynamics."

I was pretty much completely ignorant to fluid mechanics going into this, and we only really spent the last two weeks of class on fluid dynamics, so I was basically forced to learn as much fluid dynamics as quickly as I could to do this project (I had about a month). After struggling too much with Fetter and Walecka, I opened up the absolute best introduction I've seen to fluid mechanics:

Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 2, Chapters 40 and 41, respectively called "The Flow of Dry Water" and "The Flow of Wet Water" (referring to inviscid and viscous fluids.)

Strongly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in any kind of fluid mechanics.



My research was on geophysical fluid dynamics, so I didn't look through all the fluid dynamics textbooks out there, but the only other book that I found readable and useful for learning was Benoit Roisin's relatively new book
Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Physical and Numerical Aspects.

I found that nearly all the other fluid dynamics textbooks were just too stuffy and intended more as reference books rather than learning/teaching books. The treatments of fluid dynamics you find in most mechanics books are also usually extremely terse and not very good for learning. For example, Fetter and Walecka's treatment is very theoretical and basically saturates the lower bound on the amount of intuitive explanation needed to connect all the equations. Another example is Pedlosky's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, which seems intended as a reference book for meteorologists rather than physicists, since he tries his hardest express all the equations in latitude-longitude-altitude coordinates even in things like plane approximations.

Then again, all of these might be too advanced for you. Fluid mechanics is an intrinsically difficult subject and the best way to be introduced to it is by first understanding the mechanics of particles really well, especially nonlinear mechanics, then studying all the continuum-limits including strings and membranes, and only THEN going into fluids.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K