Fluid mechanics Lagrange & Euler formalism

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between Lagrange and Euler formalism in fluid mechanics, specifically addressing the temperature function T and its derivatives. The Lagrange representation fixes coordinates (x0, y0, z0) while the Euler representation tracks fluid elements along their trajectories. Key equations are provided, including the time derivative of temperature for a specific fluid element and the relationship between temperature in both formalism. The discussion clarifies how to transition between these two perspectives using multi-variable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange and Euler formalism in fluid mechanics
  • Familiarity with multi-variable calculus and chain rule
  • Knowledge of vector fields and temperature functions in fluid dynamics
  • Basic concepts of fluid element trajectories
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Navier-Stokes equations in both Lagrange and Euler forms
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in fluid mechanics
  • Explore temperature distribution in fluid dynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools
  • Investigate the implications of fluid element tracking in real-world fluid flow scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, physicists, and engineers interested in understanding the mathematical foundations of fluid dynamics and the application of Lagrange and Euler formalism.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Lagrange & Euler formalism

How we get relation

(\frac{\partial T^{(L)}}{\partial t})_{r_0}=(\frac{\partial T^{(E)}}{\partial t})_{r}+\frac{\partial T^{(E)}}{\partial x}(\frac{\partial x}{\partial t})_{r_0}+\frac{\partial T^{(E)}}{\partial y}(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})_{r_0}+\frac{\partial T^{(E)}}{\partial z}(\frac{\partial z}{\partial t})_{r_0}

T - temperature
t - time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lagrange representation
T=T^{L}(x_0,y_0,z_0,t)
where coordinates x_0,y_0,z_0 are fixed.

I have a trouble with that. Can you tell me one type of this function?
 
I think, I've explained this already some days ago in this forum.

Again, the Euler coordinates \vec{x}_0 are labels for a fixed fluid element by noting its position at a fixed (initial) time t_0. Then you follow this fluid element along its trajectory in time. This is given by the position-vector field (as a function of the Euler coordinates) \vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0).

In the Lagrange description you switch to a field description, i.e., you characterize the fluid by the velocity field, where an observer at point \vec{x} measures the velocity of the fluid element at this position at time, t. This field we denote by \vec{v}(t,\vec{x}).

The relation to the Euler coordinates is then given by

\vec{v}_0(t,\vec{x}_0)=\frac{\partial \vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)}{\partial t}=\vec{v}[t,\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)].

It gives the velocity of the fluid element, which has been at position \vec{x}_0 at time t.

The same procedure holds for any other physical quantity which has a specific meaning for a given fluid element. An example is the temperature T. In the Euler description, the temperature of the fluid element which has been at \vec{x}_0 at time t_0 at time t is given by the function T_0(t,\vec{x}_0).

In the Lagrange description, you consider the temperature at the position \vec{x} of the fluid element that is there at time, t. This function is called T(t,\vec{x}). Again, the relation between the two points of view are given by

T_0(t,\vec{x}_0)=T[t,\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)].

Now if you want the time derivative of the temperature of the specific fluid element that has been at position \vec{x}_0 at time t_0, you have to use the chain rule of multi-variable calculus,

\partial_t T_0(t,\vec{x}_0)=\left (\frac{\partial T(t,\vec{x})}{\partial t} \right)_{\vec{x}=\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)}+ \frac{\partial \vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)}{\partial t} \cdot [\vec{\nabla} T(t,\vec{x})]_{\vec{x}=\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)}=\left (\frac{\partial T(t,\vec{x})}{\partial t} \right)_{\vec{x}=\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)}+\vec{v}[t,\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)] \cdot [\vec{\nabla}\vec{\nabla} T(t,\vec{x})]_{\vec{x}=\vec{x}(t,\vec{x}_0)}.

I hope with this very detailed writing of all the arguments, the two (equivalent) descriptions of fluid mechanics and how to switch from one to the other has become more clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K