Fluid mechanics: linear momentum Quick question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the sign convention used in fluid mechanics for mass flow rate and momentum calculations. The user presents confusion regarding the application of momentum equations in a rectangular control volume, specifically contrasting two approaches: one yielding -Fx and the other yielding a different result. The key takeaway is the importance of clearly defining terms such as "momentum entering" and "momentum leaving," as these can have multiple interpretations that affect the outcome of calculations. Proper understanding of these conventions is crucial for accurate analysis in fluid dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass flow rate in fluid mechanics
  • Familiarity with momentum equations in physics
  • Knowledge of control volume analysis
  • Basic grasp of sign conventions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the momentum equation in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about control volume analysis techniques
  • Research different sign conventions used in fluid dynamics
  • Explore case studies involving momentum calculations in various flow scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in fluid mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to momentum and mass flow rate in control volumes.

Marchese_alex
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Im confused with the sign convention... From my notes I have that for

mass flow rate: Entering is -m and leaving is +m
momentum : Entering (-m)(+v) and leaving is (+m)(-v)

Example: for a rectangular control volume, let's say, left side is point 1 and right side is poinit 2. assume we need to hold it in place and flow is from point 1to point 2. If I apply the equation of momentum i get:
(-m)(+v) + (m)(-v) = -Fx (discarding other forces just to simplify)
rearange
-mv -mv= -Fx. (a)

What I am doing wrong that the book says, that it is : -mv + mv = -Fx. (b)

Im really confused because some exanples are done like (a) and others just freaking don't know like (b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, it can be annoying when a book adopts a certain convention, but doesn't explicitly state what it is, and then even changes convention.

In this specific question, it looks like you have written something equivalent to:
momentum entering + momentum leaving = -Fx
you do need to be careful with equations like this. For example, 'momentum entering' could possibly mean one of two things:
1)The velocity at point one times by mass.
2)The momentum change due to mass which has velocity inward to the rectangle (whether it comes in through point one or two).
Also, 'momentum leaving' could be interpreted in several different ways:
1)The change of momentum contained within the rectangle due to outward velocity at the surface (a negative number).
2)The absolute value of the definition just above (which will then be a positive number).
3)The velocity at point two times by mass.

So, you need to be careful to distinguish between the different possible meanings. And I know how you feel, I remember getting frustrated about problems involving the momentum going into a rectangle, and what meaning was being used.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K