Fluid mechanics problem, need explanation please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a fluid mechanics problem where the user seeks clarification on two points regarding the forces acting on a plug. The first question addresses why the plug is not treated as a vertical wall for calculating force, to which the response explains that the integral can be simplified due to the small size of the plug. The second question concerns the atmospheric pressure force, which is noted to be equal on both sides of the plug, allowing it to be ignored in calculations. The conversation emphasizes understanding the simplifications made in fluid mechanics problems. Overall, the exchange highlights the nuances of pressure forces in fluid dynamics.
Bassel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi please check the highlighted question in the attachment and the solution and see the problem, i need help please. I have two questions about it:

1- why didn't we take the plug as a vertical wall and thus the force would be integral of pressure x area?

2-WHERE DID THE FORCE DUE TO ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE GO?

Thnx for your help.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.48.23 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.48.23 PM.jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 501
  • Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.54.15 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.54.15 PM.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bassel! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Bassel said:
1- why didn't we take the plug as a vertical wall and thus the force would be integral of pressure x area?

You did.

You did ∫ ρgA(H+h) dh, but the plug is so small that you can take H+h to be a constant, H …

so that integral is just ∫ ρgAH dh :wink:
2-WHERE DID THE FORCE DUE TO ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE GO?

it nipped round the other side when you weren't looking, and started pushing back :smile:

(so it's the same on both sides, and you can ignore it)
 
by the other side you mean from outside ??
 
yes, the plug has two sides :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top