How to Determine the Angle of a Fluid in a Moving Vehicle Using Fluid Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The angle of the fluid in a moving vehicle is influenced by the vehicle's acceleration. When traveling at a constant velocity, the fluid remains level, resulting in an angle of zero. However, if the vehicle accelerates from rest, the angle can be calculated using the formula θ = tan^(-1)(a/g), where 'a' is the acceleration and 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity. This relationship highlights how changes in acceleration affect the fluid's surface angle in the cup. Understanding these dynamics is essential for applying fluid mechanics in practical scenarios.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose you're driving along a straight, smooth, level stretch of highway with a constant velocity v. There is a cup of some fluid in your cup holder. How would you go about finding the angle \theta that the surface of the fluid makes with the bottom of the cup as a function of v? And what if you started out with a velocity v_0 at time t=0 and then accelerated at a constant rate a? Can we find \theta(t) without much sweat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle of the liquid in the cup is determined by the acceleration of the car.

If you are traveling at constant velocity the angle of the liquid inside the cup will be zero. Think about when you fly on a plane at 350 mph, the liquid is still flat (unless the plane is slightly tilted).

If you start at zero velocity and begin to accelerate constantly, then the angle of the liquid in the cup will be

\theta = \tan^{-1} \left (\frac{a}{g}\right)

where a is your acceleration and g is gravity.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top