Fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy

wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I'm currently working on a lab that is exploring the Raman effect. One of the suggested exercises was to record the raman spectrum (from a mercury lamp through CCl4) around the rayleigh peaks at 435.8 nm and 404.7 nm. For the former, my results were fairly consistent with what I expected in that the frequency shifts were mostly on the ball. However, in the latter wavelength, 404.7, not only do my frequency shifts fall off the mark, but I only see stokes lines and no anti-stokes lines. My thoughts were that this might be due to the interference of fluorescence, but I'm not too familiar with this phenomenon.

Does anyone have any ideas as to why I am getting the results that I have? Any help would be most appreciated.

Cheers,
W. =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fluorescence typically means no measurement at all, since it is so much stronger than the Raman signal.

Are your Stokes lines actually cosmic ray peaks?

Claude.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top