Flux/ Divergence Theorem interpretation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of flux and the divergence theorem in multivariable calculus. Flux, represented as ∫∫ F • N dS, quantifies fluid flow through a surface S per unit time, while the divergence theorem, expressed as ∫∫∫ divF dV, measures fluid flow through a solid region. The confusion arises from the terminology, where "across" is clarified to mean "through," aligning the two concepts. This semantic distinction is crucial for understanding the relationship between surface integrals and volume integrals in vector analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with surface integrals and volume integrals
  • Knowledge of the divergence operator in vector calculus
  • Basic concepts of fluid dynamics as they relate to mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the divergence theorem in fluid dynamics
  • Explore examples of flux calculations in different vector fields
  • Learn about surface integrals and their physical interpretations
  • Investigate the relationship between divergence and curl in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students in multivariable calculus, educators teaching vector analysis, and professionals in fields involving fluid dynamics and mathematical modeling.

leehufford
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am approaching the end of my multivariable/ vector analysis "Calc III" class and have a question about flux.

My book states that flux, ∫∫ F \bullet N dS measures the fluid flow "across" a surface S per unit time.

Now, the divergence theorem ∫∫∫ divF dV measures the "same thing" but fluid flow THROUGH a solid. How can fluid flow over a surface and through a solid be equated for the same regoin? Is it actually fluid flow THROUGH a surface and not OVER it? That would make more sense.

Hopefully some people who are further along in their math journey can explain this for me. Thanks in advance,

Lee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lee! Thankfully this just seems to be a problem with the usage of English phrases. "Across" here means "through" and not "over".
 
Its like "running across the finish line".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K