Question on divergence/gradient theorem

  • #1
1,983
106
hey pf!

i had a subtlety about the divergence theroem/gradient theorem. specifically, the following was presented: $$ \iint_s p \vec{dS} = \iiint_v \nabla (p) dv$$

i am familiar with the divergence theorem, but that is for a vector "dotted" with a surface element (flux) related to the divergence (expansion) through the volume. i believe the above is the gradient theorem. can anyone verify the legitimacy of this (and perhaps offer some physical intuition if it holds). i should say [itex]p[/itex] is not a constant.

thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
134
hey pf!

i had a subtlety about the divergence theroem/gradient theorem. specifically, the following was presented: $$ \iint_s p \vec{dS} = \iiint_v \nabla (p) dv$$

i am familiar with the divergence theorem, but that is for a vector "dotted" with a surface element (flux) related to the divergence (expansion) through the volume. i believe the above is the gradient theorem. can anyone verify the legitimacy of this (and perhaps offer some physical intuition if it holds). i should say [itex]p[/itex] is not a constant.

thanks!
We may write:
[tex]\vec{dS}=dS(n_{x}\vec{i}+n_{y}\vec{j}+n_{z}\vec{k})
[tex]\int\int_{S}p\vec{dS}=\int\int_{S}pn_{x}dS\vec{i}+\int\int_{S}pn_{y}dS\vec{j}+\int\int_{S}pn_{z}dS\vec{k} (*)[/tex]
Since the Cartesian unit vector can be extracted from the integrand!
--
But, we have:
[tex]pn_{x}dS=(p\vec{i}\cdot\vec{dS})[/tex]
And the first term in RHS in (*) is then simply, by the divergence theorem:
[tex]\int\int_{S}pn_{x}dS\vec{i}=+int\int\int_{V}\frac{\partial{p}}{\partial{x}}\vec{i}dV[/tex]

Do the similar thing to the other two terms on RHS in (*), and you get your identity.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
1,983
106
thank you arildno!!!!! this makes a lot of sense now! youre brilliant!
 
  • #5
1,983
106
on another note, arildno, did you just figure this out by thinking about what's going on or did you see it in a book before? either way, thanks again
 
  • #6
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
134
I noticed it a long time ago. I don't remember if it was in a book or on my own inspiration.
 
  • #7
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,536
8,529
I'd apply Gauß's theorem to the vector field
[tex]\vec{V}(\vec{x})=\vec{a} p(\vec{x})[/tex]
for a constant vector [itex]\vec{a}[/itex]. Then you have
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{V}=\vec{a} \cdot \vec{\nabla} p.[/tex]
Then Gauß's theorem gives
[tex]\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \vec{a} \cdot \vec{\nabla} p = \vec{a} \cdot \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \vec{\nabla} p = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{a} p = \vec{a} \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} p.[/tex]
Since this is true for all [itex]\vec{a}[/itex] you have proven your vector identity.
 
  • #8
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
134
I'd apply Gauß's theorem to the vector field
[tex]\vec{V}(\vec{x})=\vec{a} p(\vec{x})[/tex]
for a constant vector [itex]\vec{a}[/itex]. Then you have
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{V}=\vec{a} \cdot \vec{\nabla} p.[/tex]
Then Gauß's theorem gives
[tex]\int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \vec{a} \cdot \vec{\nabla} p = \vec{a} \cdot \int_V \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \vec{\nabla} p = \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{a} p = \vec{a} \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} p.[/tex]
Since this is true for all [itex]\vec{a}[/itex] you have proven your vector identity.

Sure. It's matter of taste, really, which one approach is used.
After all, my method is just as general as the one you present.
 

Related Threads on Question on divergence/gradient theorem

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
36
Views
11K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
840
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top