Flux of a vector and parametric equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the flux of a vector field through a unit sphere, specifically the vector field defined as ##\vec{v} = 3xy i + x z^2 j + y^3 k##. Participants are exploring the application of Gauss's Law and the implications of symmetry in the context of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss's Law and the transformation to spherical coordinates. There is a question regarding the correctness of the integral evaluation and whether the symmetry of the integrand affects the outcome. Some participants also question the necessity of the radial part of the integral in the context of a unit sphere.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the symmetry of the integrand and its implications for the integral's value. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem specifies a unit sphere, which leads to considerations about the radial part of the integral being constant. There are also discussions about the implications of symmetry in the vector field and the volume of integration.

Xsnac
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Compute the flux of a vector field ##\vec{v}## through the unit sphere, where

$$ \vec{v} = 3xy i + x z^2 j + y^3 k $$

Homework Equations



Gauss Law:
$$ \int (\nabla \cdot \vec{B}) dV = \int \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so after applying Gauss Law, one gets
$$ \int 3y dV $$
and after converting it into a spherical integral I get
$$3 \int_0^{ \pi} \sin^2 \theta d \theta \int_0^{2 \pi} \sin \phi d \phi = 0$$ since integral of sin over a full period is. Is this correct? or if not, where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks fine, but you do not need to actually do the spherical parametrisation. You could just use that the integrand is asymmetric over a symmetric region so the result must be zero.

Edit: Also, you are missing the radial part of the integral, but it will not matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xsnac and alejandromeira
Xsnac I've been making the transformation right now and seems me that your work is ok.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xsnac
Orodruin said:
It looks fine, but you do not need to actually do the spherical parametrisation. You could just use that the integrand is asymmetric over a symmetric region so the result must be zero.

Edit: Also, you are missing the radial part of the integral, but it will not matter.
Thanks. Regarding the radial part, it specified it's unit sphere therefore constant, and = 1 so I neglected it.
 
Orodruin said:
It looks fine, but you do not need to actually do the spherical parametrisation. You could just use that the integrand is asymmetric over a symmetric region so the result must be zero.

Edit: Also, you are missing the radial part of the integral, but it will not matter.
Yes, visualizing the field in the space there are a symetry in the plane XZ, then like the volume has also spherical symetry around the point (0,0,0) we don't need to calculate anything. So is more fun! :woot::woot:
 
Last edited:
Xsnac said:
Thanks. Regarding the radial part, it specified it's unit sphere therefore constant, and = 1 so I neglected it.
This is conceptually wrong, even if the result is the same. Your original surface of integration was the unit sphere. In using the divergence theorem, you rewrite the closed surface integral as a volume integral over the enclosed volume, in this case the unit ball.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K