Flux of a Vector Through a Surface: x²+y²=8, z-x²-y²=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter cristina89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the flux of a fluid velocity vector through a closed surface defined by a paraboloid and a plane. The vector field is given in Cartesian coordinates, and the surface is bounded by specific equations in three-dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the flux integral and transformations into polar coordinates. There are questions about the correct application of the normal vector in the integral and the implications of using inward versus outward normals for the surfaces involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the mathematical expressions and the physical interpretation of the normals. Some guidance has been provided regarding the normal vectors for the surfaces, but confusion remains about the integration limits and the correct formulation of the flux integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of vector calculus and surface integrals, with specific attention to the definitions and properties of the surfaces involved. There is an emphasis on ensuring consistency in the choice of normal vectors for the calculation.

cristina89
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The velocity of a fluid is given, in cartesian coordinates (x, y, z), by \vec{v} = v_{0}x\hat{z} being a constant with velocity dimensions.
a) Calculate the flux of this vector through the closed surface composed by z-x²-y²=0 and by the plan z=8 limited by the circle with radius a=\sqrt{8} (x²+y²=8).

Homework Equations


\int\int{\vec{v}}\cdot\vec{n}\cdot dS


The Attempt at a Solution


Well. I've calculated this and it gave me 0 as a result... But I don't know if I did it right.
I've started with

\int\int{\vec{v}}\cdot\vec{n}\cdot dS = \int\int{v_{0}x}\cdot dS

So I've transformed into polar coordinates and it gave me
\int\int{v_{0}rcosθ}\cdot rdrdθ = \int\int{v_{0}rcosθ}\cdot rdrdθ
= v_{0} \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{8}_{0}r²cosθdrdθ

And developing this, it gave me 0 as a result. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cristina89! :smile:
cristina89 said:
\int\int{\vec{v}}\cdot\vec{n}\cdot dS = \int\int{v_{0}x}\cdot dS

no, \int\int{v_{0}x}(\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n})dS
 
tiny-tim said:
hi cristina89! :smile:


no, \int\int{v_{0}x}(\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n})dS

ahh ok. so \int\int{v_{0}x}(\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n})dS = \int\int v_{0}x(\hat{z})\frac{v_{0}x\hat{z}}{\sqrt{v_{0}^{2}x^{2}}} right?
What should I do after that? I'm now confused if there is this normal vector in this integral. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
cristina89 said:
\int\int{v_{0}x}(\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n})dS = \int\int v_{0}x(\hat{z})\frac{v_{0}x\hat{z}}{\sqrt{v_{0}^{2}x^{2}}}

i don't understand that :confused:

(and that fraction is just \hat{z})

\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n} is cos of the slope of the normal (= sin of the slope of the surface)
 
tiny-tim said:
i don't understand that :confused:

(and that fraction is just \hat{z})

\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n} is cos of the slope of the normal (= sin of the slope of the surface)


Can't I think that \hat{n} = \frac{v}{|v|} = \frac{v_{0}x\hat{z}}{\sqrt{v_{0}^{2}x^{2}}} = \hat{z}?
And then \int\int{v_{0}x\hat{z}\hat{z}dS}?

Can you explain to me this "\hat{z}\cdot\hat{n} is cos of the slope of the normal (= sin of the slope of the surface)"? :S I can't understand that...
 
Last edited:
There are two surfaces involved here: the paraboloid z= x^2+ y^2 and the plane z= 8. Obviously (I hope it is obvious!) the outward normal to the plane z= 8 is \vec{k} and the inward normal is -\vec{k}.

The paraboloid z= x^2+ y^2/ can be written in vector form, using x and y as parameters, as \vec{r}(x,y)= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ z\vec{k}= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (x^2+ y^2)\vec{l}. The two derivative vectors, with respect to x and y are
\vec{r}_x= \vec{i}+2x\vec{k} and \vec{r}_y= \vec{j}+ 2y\vec{k} are tangent vectors to the surface at each point. Their cross product,
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}\vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ 1 & 0 & 2x \\ 0 & 1 & 2y\end{array}\right|= -2x\vec{i}- 2y\vec{j}+\vec{k}
is normal to the surface and \vec{n}dS= (-2x\vec{i}- 2y\vec{j}+ \vec{k})dxdy
That, with x and y components negative, pointing inward, is the "inward normal". Multiplying by -1 to get 2x\vec{i}+ 2y\vec{j}- \vec{k} gives the "outward normal". For this problem, where you are calculating the "flux", the flux all the way through, it doesn't matter whether you use "inward" or "outward" normals as long as you are consistent, using the same for both paraboloid and plane.
 
HallsofIvy said:
There are two surfaces involved here: the paraboloid z= x^2+ y^2 and the plane z= 8. Obviously (I hope it is obvious!) the outward normal to the plane z= 8 is \vec{k} and the inward normal is -\vec{k}.

The paraboloid z= x^2+ y^2/ can be written in vector form, using x and y as parameters, as \vec{r}(x,y)= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ z\vec{k}= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (x^2+ y^2)\vec{l}. The two derivative vectors, with respect to x and y are
\vec{r}_x= \vec{i}+2x\vec{k} and \vec{r}_y= \vec{j}+ 2y\vec{k} are tangent vectors to the surface at each point. Their cross product,
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}\vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ 1 & 0 & 2x \\ 0 & 1 & 2y\end{array}\right|= -2x\vec{i}- 2y\vec{j}+\vec{k}
is normal to the surface and \vec{n}dS= (-2x\vec{i}- 2y\vec{j}+ \vec{k})dxdy
That, with x and y components negative, pointing inward, is the "inward normal". Multiplying by -1 to get 2x\vec{i}+ 2y\vec{j}- \vec{k} gives the "outward normal". For this problem, where you are calculating the "flux", the flux all the way through, it doesn't matter whether you use "inward" or "outward" normals as long as you are consistent, using the same for both paraboloid and plane.

Thank you!
Is it right to bound the integrals like this \int^{2∏}_{0}\int^{8}_{0}?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K