Flux of Electric Field through a cone

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of electric flux through a cone with no charge inside, concluding that the total flux is zero. The lateral surface flux is calculated as Ø(lateral surface) = -E.π.R².R/√(R²+h²), while the base surface flux is Ø(base surface) = E.πR².cosΩ, with Ω defined as arctg(h/R). Participants identify potential discrepancies in a referenced solution, particularly regarding angle misinterpretations, affirming the correctness of the original calculations presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric flux concepts
  • Familiarity with Gauss's Law
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically arctangent
  • Basic principles of electric fields and their homogeneity
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Gauss's Law applications in electrostatics
  • Study electric flux calculations in various geometries
  • Learn about the implications of angle measurements in electric field problems
  • Explore common mistakes in electric field calculations and their resolutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric flux and field calculations.

Moara
Messages
43
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A conic surface is placed Inside a region filled with uniform Electric Field E. The field lines are perpendicular to the geratrix AB. The cone has height h and radius R of it's base. Find the electric flux through the lateral surface of the cone.
Relevant Equations
Ø=E.S.cosx Øtot=qint/€ (gaus law)
Since there is no charge inside the cone, the total flux through its surface is zero, hence Ø(lateral surface)+∅(base surface)=0. But ∅(base surface)=E.πR².cosΩ, because electric Field is homogenous. But by the figure, Ω is just arctg(h/R).
So Ø(lateral surface)=-E.π.R².R/√(R²+h²).
This is not the answer according to the solution I saw. My point is, does anyone could show me where is my mistake?
15720384362294540504960180785928.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks correct to me. Do you remember the form of the answer from the solution?
 
Here is the solution I saw. The sentence : " temos que" is equal to " we have that"
Screenshot_2019-10-25-21-14-52-850_com.android.browser.png
 
Looks like this is a different problem where they want the flux through the two shaded regions (the triangle and the semicircle). But I think there is a mistake in the solution where they inadvertently switched the two angles in the third line:
1572050553808.png


Anyway, I think your work is correct for the problem you stated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Moara

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
905
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K