Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Focal Curve of an Achromatic Doublet

  1. Feb 29, 2012 #1
    I have a problem with the determination of the correct focal curve of an achromatic double.

    I'm considering here a doublet formed by a biconvex Flint Glass lens attached to a plano-concave crown glass lens. ( I know that the typical design of the doublet is a biconvex crown lens attach to a plano-concave flint glass lens. but here I'm interested in the opposite.)

    I'm also assuming that I aim to achromatize the C and F Fraunhofer lines.

    The optical powers of the two lenses are:
    P1 = n_flint * (1/R1-1/R2)
    P2 = n_crown*(1/R3) [ I assume that R4=∞, since this is a plano-concave lens ]

    I also know the optical power (Pt) of my system at the D Fraunhofer line.

    The classic textbook formulas say that the conditions required to design a doublet are:

    P1 = Pt * Δ2/(Δ2-Δ1)
    P2 = -Pt * Δ1/(Δ2-Δ1)

    Where Δi = (ni_F - ni_C) / (ni_D-1) ( i=1,2 stands for the first or second lens, respectively), and n_F, n_C and n_D are the refractive indexes of the respective glass.
    We have 2 equations and 3 unknowns ( R1,R2 and R3), so in order to solve this problem I must choose an arbitrary radius R1 for example.

    My problem is that after I solve the system and find the required radius, when I plot the focal shift of my system it yields a focal shift of 1*10^-15 in the whole visible spectrum, when in theory the focal shift should only be zero valued for the C and F lines..

    Can anyone Explain me what I'm doing wrong?

    Thank you in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 29, 2012 #2

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    I'm having trouble following your 'textbook formula'- where is the lens spacing (and lens thickness) specified? Kingslake's book even works out a flint-in-front doublet.
     
  4. Mar 1, 2012 #3
    You are right, but I forgot to mention that the lenses are thin lenses and that they are in contact with each other. In this case, the formulas I mentioned are the correct ones.
     
  5. Mar 1, 2012 #4
    You can find the formulas here: http://pt.scribd.com/doc/58102523/138/Achromatic-Doublet-Lens-Design [Broken]

    but they can also be found for example in the classical book Principles of Optics of Max Born and Wolf..
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  6. Mar 1, 2012 #5

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Thanks- the reference helped me a lot.

    Ok, so I got a different solution from you. Using the numbers from the referenced book, the total optical power [itex]\phi[/itex] = 1/254 = 0.0039 and the Abbe numbers for the front flint and back crown are 36.3 and 64.5, respectively.

    I can interpret your design in two ways: either the front element is a (hopefully biconvex) flint, or the front element is a plano-convex crown.

    For a flint-first, I get that the flint must have negative power, because Va < Vb. You can make it a biconcave, but it cannot be biconvex or even plano-convex

    For a plano-convex front crown, the optical powers [itex]\phi_{a}[/itex] and [itex]\phi_{b}[/itex] of the two elements are the same as 'normal' (0.009 and -0.0051), but again the flint element must have a negative power and cannot be biconvex.

    Does this help? Or am I missing something?
     
  7. Mar 1, 2012 #6
    Thank you so much for your quick answer. My problem is actually related with a correct determination of the focal curve of an achromatic doublet.

    In my problem I am using a standard solution, which consists of a biconvex Crown glass lens attached to a plano-concave Flint Glass Lens.

    In order to model the refractive indices of the two glasses in the visible domain I am using the well-known Cauchy's equations:
    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy's_equation)

    n(λ) = A + B/λ2 ( with λ in μm).

    n1(λ) - Flint Glass
    n2(λ) - Crown Glass

    For the flint glass I am considering:
    A=1.7280
    B=0.01342

    For the crown glass I am considering:
    A=1.5220
    B=0.00459

    Now lets say I want my lens to have a total focal lenght f-1=100mm

    For Simplicity I assume that I have a equiconvex Crown glass lens ( like in the example I showed you) such that r2=-r1.

    So basically I want to find two radiis, r2 and r3. When I do so and I try to plot the total focal shift of the systems, it yields a curve that is practically zero valued in the whole visible spectrum, but it should only be zero for the C and F lines..
     
  8. Mar 1, 2012 #7

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    I'm afraid I'm really confused now:

     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Focal Curve of an Achromatic Doublet
  1. Focal length (Replies: 1)

  2. Focal point purpose (Replies: 1)

Loading...