Force between two charges in closed universe

AI Thread Summary
In a closed spherical universe, the force between two charges is initially thought to follow an inverse square law (1/r^2) when they are close together. As the charges move apart, the force is suggested to approach zero, but it is clarified that the electric field extends to infinity, meaning the force never truly becomes zero. A proposed modification to the force equation is (2R-r)/2Rr^2, which approximates 1/r^2 for small distances and approaches zero when the charges are maximally separated. The discussion also considers the symmetry of the charges on a spherical surface, suggesting that the force may diminish at certain points due to symmetry. Overall, the nature of forces in a closed universe remains complex and open to theoretical exploration.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Say we have two charges in a closed spherical universe, of radius R, a distance r apart. If the charges are close, r<<R, we might guess that the force would go as 1/r^2?

Let the two charges move away from each other till they are as far apart as possible. At this point the force between charges is zero?

How might we modify the 1/r^2 force to fit the above criteria?

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not know, if I understood your question well, correct me if I got it wrong.

Spinnor said:
Let the two charges move away from each other till they are as far apart as possible. At this point the force between charges is zero?

The force will not ever be zero, because electric field extends to infinity.
 
Are you inventing a toy universe? Then you can make the force behave any way you want. why not something like (2R-r)/2Rr^2, which behaves like 1/r^2 for small r, and vanishes when the particles are on the opposite sides of the "universe"
 
Tominator said:
I do not know, if I understood your question well, correct me if I got it wrong.



The force will not ever be zero, because electric field extends to infinity.

Imagine the two charges on the surface of a sphere, S^2, located at each pole. Because of the symmetry the field will go to zero at the poles. I think the same will occur in S^3.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top