Force equations: Force on ground by angled supports

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating forces on supports at an angle, specifically focusing on a scenario involving a force of 60 kN and angles of 45 and 20 degrees. Participants are tasked with determining the forces at points A and C and representing these forces as vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to balance forces in the y-direction and question the relationships between the components of the forces involved. There are attempts to express the forces in terms of trigonometric functions and to clarify the roles of different variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the force equations and questioning the assumptions made about the relationships between the forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the components of the forces, but there remains uncertainty about specific calculations and the overall setup.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions of certain variables and the setup of the problem, as well as language barriers affecting communication. Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches and the implications of their findings.

rihitz
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


14513699_1123621714339842_1207432723_o.jpg
[/B]
P=60kN
angle alpha = 45 degrees
angle beta = 20 degrees

The task is to calculate the force on the base A and C, and to draw vectors that represent those forces.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I did similar examples at the class, but when I had to do this one on the test, I just could not get it done.

If I could get the balanced equations down correctly, I would manage to do the rest. (balanced force equations on x and y axis)

Sorry if there are wrong terms used, I am not a native speaker. Ill try to explain if there is anything unclear.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?

I'm no physicist, but I would think that some there might exist some r, such that r*(sin 20 + sin 45 ) = 60. This might help you balance out the y direction.
 
RUber said:
What have you tried so far?

I'm no physicist, but I would think that some there might exist some r, such that r*(sin 20 + sin 45 ) = 60. This might help you balance out the y direction.
Well the R should be right above the P in that case, which cancels the P itself. But that didnt help me out. Or I am drawing something incorectly
 
I was thinking that r would be a scalar...rsin(20) is the y component of the vector acting at point C, r sin 45 would be the y component of the vector acting at point A.
 
Or perhaps that is too simple. Let's take another look at this...
You have two force vectors W and V, each one has magnitude |W| and |V|, respectively.
You want to find those magnitudes such that the following equations are satisfied:
## |W| \sin 45 + |V| \sin 20 = 60##
##|W| \cos 45 = |V| \cos 20##
Does that seem more reasonable?
 
1475086289183.jpg

I am a bit confused.

Is this equation for the projection of all forces on y-axis wrong?
 
I also don't get why on the second equation both magnitudes have to be equal? Id say they won't be equal, since the angles are different
 
If F and G are the compression forces in rods AB and BC, what are the components of these forces in the x- and y directions?
 
Chestermiller said:
If F and G are the compression forces in rods AB and BC, what are the components of these forces in the x- and y directions?
In the picture F and G is Fw and Fv. Is that right? In that case components are. P/sin45 and P/sin20 for the y axis. And P*cos45 and P*cos20 for the x axis. Atleast if I got it right.
 
  • #10
rihitz said:
In the picture F and G is Fw and Fv. Is that right? In that case components are. P/sin45 and P/sin20 for the y axis. And P*cos45 and P*cos20 for the x axis. Atleast if I got it right.
You didn't get it right.

Step 1 - Forget about P.

Step 2 - From the trigonometry, what are the components of F and G in terms of F, G, and the angles.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
You didn't get it right.

Step 1 - Forget about P.

Step 2 - From the trigonometry, what are the components of F and G in terms of F, G, and the angles.
1475088641021.jpg


Like this?
 
  • #12
Yes. Very nice.

The signs on the G components should be - in the x direction and + in the y direction. Now, using the upper junction point as your free body, do a force balance in the x direction and a force balance in the y direction on the junction point. What do you get?
 
  • #13
Chestermiller said:
Yes. Very nice.

The signs on the G components should be - in the x direction and + in the y direction. Now, using the upper junction point as your free body, do a force balance in the x direction and a force balance in the y direction on the junction point. What do you get?
I hope I understood correctly what you asked due to the language barier.

But I guess this is what you meant:
1475089658584.jpg
 
  • #14
rihitz said:
I hope I understood correctly what you asked due to the language barier.

But I guess this is what you meant:
View attachment 106625
Excellent. Now solve for F and G.

Also, now compare with Ruber's post #5.
 
  • #15
Chestermiller said:
Excellent. Now solve for F and G.

Also, now compare with Ruber's post #5.
Is this correct?
1475090812690.jpg
 
  • #16
Your methodology is correct. I didn't check your algebra. If you want to do that, just substitute your results into the two force balance equations and see if the equations are satisfied.
 
  • #17
Chestermiller said:
Your methodology is correct. I didn't check your algebra. If you want to do that, just substitute your results into the two force balance equations and see if the equations are satisfied.
Great! Thanks! To both of you.
So my mistake was that I tried to make components of F and G from P? While I actually had to make them from the F and G itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
Your methodology is correct. I didn't check your algebra. If you want to do that, just substitute your results into the two force balance equations and see if the equations are satisfied.
Im sorry. Could you please tell me where I am wrong again? I am using the same methodology, but I have a feeling its incorrect, cause I can't find the second force momentum equation.

The A, Ax, Ay, C , Cy and Cx is added by me. Everything else was given.
 
  • #19
Why am I getting a negative Cy, when it should be positive?
 
  • #20
rihitz said:
Im sorry. Could you please tell me where I am wrong again? I am using the same methodology, but I have a feeling its incorrect, cause I can't find the second force momentum equation.

The A, Ax, Ay, C , Cy and Cx is added by me. Everything else was given.

I do not understand the connection between this post and the rest of this thread. What are Ax etc.?
 
  • #21
haruspex said:
I do not understand the connection between this post and the rest of this thread. What are Ax etc.?
Oh sorry.. the image was not uploaded.
Here:
1475148044420.jpg
 
  • #22
rihitz said:
Oh sorry.. the image was not uploaded.
Here:
View attachment 106647
Please start a new thread for this new problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
909
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K