Force exerted by rod on a mass moving in vertical circle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the forces exerted by a rigid rod on a mass moving in a vertical circle. Participants agree that at the top of the circle, the tension in the rod is at its minimum, as it must counterbalance the weight of the mass and provide the necessary centripetal force. The net force exerted by the rod is a combination of gravitational and tension forces, which varies depending on the position of the mass in the circle. Key insights include the distinction between the behavior of a rod and a string, particularly in how they can exert forces in different directions based on their structural properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its role in circular motion.
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams and vector addition of forces.
  • Knowledge of gravitational force and its effects on objects in motion.
  • Concept of tension in different types of connectors (rod vs. string).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of centripetal acceleration and its relationship with angular velocity.
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams for objects in circular motion.
  • Explore the differences in force transmission between rigid rods and flexible strings.
  • Investigate the effects of varying speeds on the forces acting on a mass in vertical circular motion.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in dynamics and the forces involved in circular motion will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
Father_Ing said:
Is this an action-reaction force? Which means there will be a force downward (with the same in magnitude as the force you have stated) that applies on the rod?
Yes. All real forces are "action-reaction" forces. If the rod pushes up on the mass, the mass pushes down on the rod. That is Newton's third law.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vcsharp2003
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
haruspex said:
Not sure what you mean by "need" there.
We know it is radially inward because we are told the mass moves in a circle at uniform speed. Presumably this is arranged by a varying torque applied at the axle on which the rod rotates.
Is it not possible for the end of the rod to be the one which keep the speed constant? As what @vcsharp2003 is trying to say.
 
  • #33
Rikudo said:
Is it not possible for the end of the rod to be the one which keep the speed constant? As what @vcsharp2003 is trying to say.
I understand that question even less.
Some mechanism acts to keep the speed constant. We do not know and do not care what it is. We can deduce the force it must be exerting on the mass to achieve that, because we know that the net result of that force and mg is a radially inward force providing the centripetal acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Father_Ing
  • #34
haruspex said:
Not sure what you mean by "need" there
I was just trying to decide whether ##a_t>0## or ##a_t=0##, where ##a_t## stands for tangential acceleration in horizontal position. I wasn't trying to understand why speed is constant, which you've explained through a varying torque mechanism.
 
  • #35
vcsharp2003 said:
I was just trying to decide whether ##a_t>0## or ##a_t=0##, where ##a_t## stands for tangential acceleration in horizontal position. I wasn't trying to understand why speed is constant, which you've explained through a varying torque mechanism.
Tangential acceleration is the component of acceleration parallel to the velocity. If speed is constant, that must be zero.
(In vectors, ##0=\frac{d}{dt}v^2=\frac{d}{dt}\vec v^2=2\vec v.\dot{\vec v}=2||\vec v|| a_t##.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vcsharp2003
  • #36
haruspex said:
Tangential acceleration is the component of acceleration parallel to the velocity. If speed is constant, that must be zero.
(In vectors, ##0=\frac{d}{dt}v^2=\frac{d}{dt}\vec v^2=\vec v.\dot{\vec v}=||\vec v|| a_t##.)
Yes, I get that part. If only direction of velocity is changing but not it's magnitude then tangential acceleration must be zero.
 
  • #37
haruspex said:
(In vectors, ##0=\frac{d}{dt}v^2=\frac{d}{dt}\vec v^2=\vec v.\dot{\vec v}=||\vec v|| a_t##.)
Why did you take derivative of ##v^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #38
vcsharp2003 said:
Why did you take derivative of ##v^2##?
The speed, v, is constant if and only if ##v^2## is constant. Using the squared form let's me write it in vectors easily.
But I did omit a factor 2, now corrected.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vcsharp2003 and Delta2
  • #39
haruspex said:
The speed, v, is constant if and only if ##v^2## is constant. Using the squared form let's me write it in vectors easily.
But I did omit a factor 2, now corrected.
That's a very nice mathematical way of reasoning it, that I was unaware of. Thankyou for that great tip.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
864
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K