Force Field to Motion Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the equation of motion from an arbitrary force field, particularly in the context of gravitational forces. It highlights the necessity of two initial conditions, including initial velocity, to obtain a unique solution for motion. The relationship between potential energy and force is emphasized, noting that the force field provides acceleration, which can be integrated to find position. The conversation also touches on the complexity of solving second-order differential equations in three dimensions and suggests exploring Lagrangian mechanics for further insights. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately modeling motion in various force fields.
champion19
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
In my mechanics class, we have discussed basics dynamics relationships and equilibria aspects, and we recently considered Newton's Law of Gravitation. In our discussion, we went through how to determine potential energy and used this to perform most of our calculations with respect to velocity at a position, and we discussed Kepler's Laws as well.

However, something which we did not discuss, and which intrigues me is how, given say, an arbitrary force field (such as gravitational) as a function of position \vec{\mathbf{r}} and an initial starting position \mathbf{r_0}, how would we find the equation of motion?

(If it is extremely complicated in three dimensions, I would still be interested to see how it is done in one dimension)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't, you need two initial conditions to get a unique equation of motion.

Do you know the relationship between potential and force?
Do you know how to get an equation of motion from force?
 
champion19 said:
However, something which we did not discuss, and which intrigues me is how, given say, an arbitrary force field (such as gravitational) as a function of position r⃗ \vec{\mathbf{r}} and an initial starting position r0\mathbf{r_0}, how would we find the equation of motion?
Is the initial velocity zero? The force field gives you the acceleration, which integrated twice gives you the position change. But you need to know the integration constant for initial velocity.
 
Last edited:
Oh I hadn't thought about that but sure, it would be fine to assume that the initial velocity is zero. Yes we have discussed how to convert potential and force as well as how to convert acceleration or force to an equation of motion when it is given as a function of time. What is confusing me though is that in a field equation, it is given as a function of space, and to get the position function, you have to integrate it with respect to time.
 
Well sure, you end up with a second order differential equation, which you must solve.
$$-\vec\nabla \phi(\vec r) = m\ddot\vec r$$
Since you want ##\vec r(t)##, you'll most likely be given ##\phi##.
You won't find a general equation of motion though... just like normal really.

You may also want to have a look at "lagrangian mechanics".
Or look up college lectures under the heading "classical mechanics".
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top